Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services · Utah

R & R Machine Service

North Salt Lake, UT · ~33 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R & R Machine Service runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

R & R Machine Service: 2.8 TCR = 132% of Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R & R Machine Service safety composite

R & R Machine Service scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2019→2024

R & R Machine Service injury rate improved

R & R Machine Service's TCR fell 5.4 from 8.4 in 2019 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=8.4 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · North Salt Lake, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.8 · 132% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/18
  • PHOTO Howell Tractor and E…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Howell Tractor and Equipment (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

R & R Machine Service in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R & R Machine Service averages 2.8 TCR (132% of the Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R & R Machine Service TCR series: 2019=8.4 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 2.1

Where R & R Machine Service falls in its industry

2,560 Industrial equipment and machi establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 18 Industrial equipment and machi employers in Utah.

R & R Machine Service (33 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate R & R Machine Service
R & R Machine Service (33 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

R & R Machine Service has fewer employees than the Industrial equipment and machinery repai median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.2 2.6 2 0 0
2019 8.4 2.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · UT · North Salt Lake

2,560 Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 68 employers in North Salt Lake, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Howell Tractor and Equipment 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Paving Shop 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Power Systems, L.L.C. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ICSCRC 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Roosevelt Field Office 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Richmond American Homes of Utah 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beehive Buildings Holdings Inc 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southwest Airlines Expansion Project 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-SALT 831 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spectrum Academy 718 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABS-0030-0030-06579 FAC-06579-NORTH SALT LAKE-UT 449 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chevron Salt Lake Refinery 322 FTE
NAT-TCR Mesquite 10085 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR North Adams-Ma27 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR HOPEDALE-MA14 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR School District of Lodi 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fort Kearny Consolidated 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glen Burnie 10136 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gainesville 10182 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Niagara Falls 10237 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.