Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses · Texas

Fort Worth Meat Packers

Fort Worth, TX · ~271 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fort Worth Meat Packers runs at 476% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses workplace, earning a grade F.

Fort Worth Meat Packers: 15.7 TCR = 476% of Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fort Worth Meat Packers safety composite

Fort Worth Meat Packers scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−23.0

2021→2022

Fort Worth Meat Packers injury rate improved

Fort Worth Meat Packers's TCR fell 23.0 from 27.2 in 2021 to 4.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 27.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=27.2 · 2022=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311612 · Fort Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 15.7 · 476% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #50/51
  • PHOTO Daily's Premium Meat…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 87 inj
  • SIZE ~271 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Daily's Premium Meats St. Joseph, Mo. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Fort Worth Meat Packers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fort Worth Meat Packers averages 15.7 TCR (476% of the Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fort Worth Meat Packers TCR series: 2021=27.2 · 2022=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Fort Worth Meat Packers falls in its industry

613 Boxed meat produced from purch establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 51 Boxed meat produced from purch employers in Texas.

Fort Worth Meat Packers (271 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fort Worth Meat Packers
Fort Worth Meat Packers (271 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Fort Worth Meat Packers has more employees than the Boxed meat produced from purchased carca median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.2 3.2 11 1 0
2021 27.2 13.4 76 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311612 · TX · Fort Worth

613 Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Daily's Premium Meats St. Joseph, Mo. 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Old Hickory Smokehouse LLC 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Butcher Block, Inc. dba North Country Smokehouse 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Verde Farms LLC 15.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE JBS Live Pork LLC. Dalhart 271 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sandbox Transportation LLC 271 FTE
STATE-SIZE Toro Bravo Construction 271 FTE
STATE-SIZE HUNTON SERVICES 271 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR 6458-ZWLM 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Knight's Companies, Inc. Shop 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0474 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR County Waste of Pennsylvania LLC 2 15.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Arc Middlesex County 271 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0373 - Independence Mo Whse 271 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1088 - Bolingbrook Il Whse 271 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0317 - Lancaster Pa Whse 271 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.