Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building · Mississippi

Fountain Construction / Attention

Jackson, MS · ~132 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fountain Construction / Attention runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade B.

Fountain Construction / Attention: 1.9 TCR = 67% of Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fountain Construction / Attention safety composite

Fountain Construction / Attention scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Fountain Construction / Attention held a steady TCR band

Fountain Construction / Attention's TCR held near 0.2 from 3.0 in 2018 to 2.8 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Jackson, MS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 67% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #17/35
  • PHOTO TCCo-SEA
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TCCo-SEA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Fountain Construction / Attention in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fountain Construction / Attention averages 1.9 TCR (67% of the Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fountain Construction / Attention TCR series: 2018=3 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.8 · BLS 2.9

Where Fountain Construction / Attention falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 35 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Mississippi.

Fountain Construction / Attention (132 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Fountain Construction / Attention
Fountain Construction / Attention (132 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Fountain Construction / Attention has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation gene median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.8 1.4 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.0 2.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MS · Jackson

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 260 employers in Jackson, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TCCo-SEA 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Concord General Contracting, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manheim Corporation 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR C&L Contracting Corp. 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pearl River Valley EPA 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE PLASKOLITE SOUTH, LLC 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dunlap & Kyle Co Inc 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4016-18178020 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Dominic Jackson Memorial Hospital 2,937 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mississippi Baptist Medical Center 2,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Memorial Hospital - Mississippi Baptist Medical Center 2,566 FTE
CITY-NEAR MSJAC - JACKSON 1,458 FTE
NAT-TCR Lulu'S Fun Food, LLC. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Oceanside Ca Manufacturing 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 2501 Orlando Florida 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR PSR : Louisville R/D Lab 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE ABS IntelliGen 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enginetics Corporation 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Agena Bioscience, Inc. 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dynamic Industries, Inc. - Coatings 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.