Continuing care retirement communities · California

Fountainview at Gonda (JHA West 16 LLC)

Playa Vista, CA · ~144 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fountainview at Gonda (JHA West 16 LLC) runs at 447% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Fountainview at Gonda (JHA West 16 LLC): 17.0 TCR = 447% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fountainview at Gonda (JHA West 16 LLC) safety composite

Fountainview at Gonda (JHA West 16 LLC) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fountainview at Gonda (JHA West 16 LLC): 9.2 → 12.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 28.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.24× in 2024

Fountainview at Gonda (JHA West 16 LLC)'s TCR rose 2.8 from 9.2 in 2017 to 12.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 28.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Playa Vista, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 17.0 · 447% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #189/216
  • PHOTO ActivCare Living
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 110 inj
  • SIZE ~144 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ActivCare Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Fountainview at Gonda (JHA West 16 LLC) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fountainview at Gonda (JHA West 16 LLC) averages 17.0 TCR (447% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fountainview at Gonda (JHA West 16 LLC) TCR series: 2017=9.2 · 2018=13.8 · 2019=11.1 · 2020=27 · 2021=28.8 · 2024=12 · BLS 3.8

Where Fountainview at Gonda (JHA West 16 LLC) falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #189 safest of 216 Continuing care retirement com employers in California.

Fountainview at Gonda (JHA West 16 LLC) (144 employees, TCR 17.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fountainview at Gonda (JHA West 16 LLC)
Fountainview at Gonda (JHA West 16 LLC) (144 employees, TCR 17.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Fountainview at Gonda (JHA West 16 LLC) has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.0 4.0 15 0 0
2021 28.8 19.6 29 15 0
2020 27.0 25.2 16 30 0
2019 11.1 7.0 19 0 0
2018 13.8 9.9 19 2 0
2017 9.2 6.9 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Playa Vista

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 7 employers in Playa Vista, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ActivCare Living 17.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greeley Village 17.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bickford of Spotsylvania 17.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westchester Village of Lenexa 17.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Matsui Nursery, Inc 144 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hilltop Ranch Inc. - Turlock Rd. 144 FTE
STATE-SIZE DAGO'S CONTRACTING 144 FTE
STATE-SIZE LADWP 1230 3RD 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR 10536 Playa Vista 213 FTE
CITY-NEAR LA Stadium Sales Center 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ivy Park at Playa Vista 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2248-63202 78 FTE
NAT-TCR Easling Construction Co. 17.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Woods on French Creek Nursing and Rehab 17.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hazeltine Nurseries, Inc. 17.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1747 Rpb1000 17.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Medical Components, Inc. 144 FTE
NAT-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Houston 144 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kiolbassa Provision Company Brazos 144 FTE
NAT-SIZE Robinson Fans PA Plant 1 144 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.