Produce, fresh, merchant wholesalers · Pennsylvania

Four Seasons Produce, Inc.

Ephrata, PA · ~553 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Four Seasons Produce, Inc. runs at 348% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Produce, fresh, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Four Seasons Produce, Inc.: 7.7 TCR = 348% of Produce, fresh, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Four Seasons Produce, Inc. safety composite

Four Seasons Produce, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.9

2016→2024

Four Seasons Produce, Inc. injury rate improved

Four Seasons Produce, Inc.'s TCR fell 6.9 from 10.4 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.4 · 2017=13.1 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=9.8 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=3.7 · 2024=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424480 · Ephrata, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 348% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #15/21
  • PHOTO SS 2023, LLC dba Sir…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 301 inj
  • SIZE ~553 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SS 2023, LLC dba Sirna & Sons Produce (NOR) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Four Seasons Produce, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Four Seasons Produce, Inc. averages 7.7 TCR (348% of the Produce, fresh, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Four Seasons Produce, Inc. TCR series: 2016=10.4 · 2017=13.1 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=9.8 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=3.7 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 2.2

Where Four Seasons Produce, Inc. falls in its industry

369 Produce, fresh, merchant whole establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 21 Produce, fresh, merchant whole employers in Pennsylvania.

Four Seasons Produce, Inc. (553 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Four Seasons Produce, Inc.
Four Seasons Produce, Inc. (553 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Four Seasons Produce, Inc. has more employees than the Produce, fresh, merchant wholesalers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 2.7 20 1 0
2021 3.7 3.5 21 0 0
2020 5.6 4.9 32 0 0
2019 9.8 8.7 55 0 0
2018 7.3 6.5 45 0 0
2017 13.1 9.5 71 1 0
2016 10.4 9.0 57 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424480 · PA · Ephrata

369 Produce, fresh, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 75 employers in Ephrata, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SS 2023, LLC dba Sirna & Sons Produce (NOR) 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSP Ashland 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mr Greens Produce - Austin 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR FreshPoint Atlanta 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Plants 11 & 12 554 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5185 554 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1101 Enterprise Dr Royersford PA 552 FTE
STATE-SIZE Johnson and Johnson Consumer Health Care Lititz 551 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ephrata Community Hospital 986 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2340 366 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2340 354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairmount Homes 308 FTE
NAT-TCR 237 Nashua 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Royal Crown Bottling Co. of Hagerstown 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 2690 Far106 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Arden Courts of Sterling Heights 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kith Kitchens LLC 553 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wheeling Handi-Foil 553 FTE
NAT-SIZE Omni Shoreham Hotel 553 FTE
NAT-SIZE Das North America 553 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.