Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly · Michigan

Arden Courts of Sterling Heights

Sterling Heights, MI · ~51 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arden Courts of Sterling Heights runs at 201% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly workplace, earning a grade F.

Arden Courts of Sterling Heights: 7.7 TCR = 201% of Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arden Courts of Sterling Heights safety composite

Arden Courts of Sterling Heights scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.1

2016→2024

Arden Courts of Sterling Heights injury rate improved

Arden Courts of Sterling Heights's TCR fell 7.1 from 7.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 15.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.1 · 2017=9.8 · 2018=7.6 · 2019=10.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=11.2 · 2023=15.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Sterling Heights, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 201% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #42/97
  • PHOTO St. Joseph of the Pi…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St. Joseph of the Pines Health Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Arden Courts of Sterling Heights in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arden Courts of Sterling Heights averages 7.7 TCR (201% of the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arden Courts of Sterling Heights TCR series: 2016=7.1 · 2017=9.8 · 2018=7.6 · 2019=10.4 · 2020=0 · 2022=11.2 · 2023=15.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Arden Courts of Sterling Heights falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted Living Facilities for establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 97 Assisted Living Facilities for employers in Michigan.

Arden Courts of Sterling Heights (51 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Arden Courts of Sterling Heights
Arden Courts of Sterling Heights (51 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Arden Courts of Sterling Heights has fewer employees than the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elder median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 15.1 7.6 4 0 0
2022 11.2 11.2 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 10.4 7.8 4 0 0
2018 7.6 5.1 3 0 0
2017 9.8 7.3 4 0 0
2016 7.1 7.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MI · Sterling Heights

4,127 Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 195 employers in Sterling Heights, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St. Joseph of the Pines Health Center 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Wellington at North Bend Crossing 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oak Terrace Assisted Living of North Mankato 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie Winds of Urbana 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jack Pine Farms, LLC 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bay County Waste Water Treatment Plant 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turner Electric Service, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillsdale County Road Commission 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterling Heights Assembly Plant 5,783 FTE
CITY-NEAR STERLING PLNT 2,319 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterling Stamping Plant 2,115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conti, LLC 1,892 FTE
NAT-TCR 2690 Far106 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Air Comfort Inc. 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Four Seasons Produce, Inc. 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 237 Nashua 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Molded Products, Inc 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 601 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 074 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primrose Retirement Community of Zanesville 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.