Beef produced in slaughtering plants · Georgia

FPL Food Main Plant

Augusta, GA · ~650 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FPL Food Main Plant runs at 127% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Beef produced in slaughtering plants workplace, earning a grade D.

FPL Food Main Plant: 4.2 TCR = 127% of Beef produced in slaughtering plants BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FPL Food Main Plant safety composite

FPL Food Main Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 55%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2024

FPL Food Main Plant injury rate improved

FPL Food Main Plant's TCR fell 2.3 from 4.7 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=6.4 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311611 · Augusta, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 127% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Sioux City Fabricati…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 271 inj
  • SIZE ~650 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sioux City Fabrication Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

FPL Food Main Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FPL Food Main Plant averages 4.2 TCR (127% of the Beef produced in slaughtering plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FPL Food Main Plant TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=6.4 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where FPL Food Main Plant falls in its industry

212 Beef produced in slaughtering establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Beef produced in slaughtering employers in Georgia.

FPL Food Main Plant (650 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate FPL Food Main Plant
FPL Food Main Plant (650 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3

FPL Food Main Plant has more employees than the Beef produced in slaughtering plants median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 1.7 14 0 0
2023 2.8 2.1 19 0 0
2022 2.6 1.2 21 0 0
2021 2.9 1.5 21 2 0
2020 5.1 2.8 35 5 0
2019 4.8 1.8 37 0 0
2018 6.4 2.9 45 0 0
2017 6.1 5.9 44 0 0
2016 4.7 3.0 35 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311611 · GA · Augusta

212 Beef produced in slaughtering plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 373 employers in Augusta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sioux City Fabrication Plant 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Green Bay Dressed Beef, LLC Acme Plant 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grinds - Columbia SC 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR H&B Packing Co. Inc 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE T&J Industries Development and Contracting, Inc 651 FTE
STATE-SIZE R+L Carriers - ATL 649 FTE
STATE-SIZE MetroAtlanta Ambulance Service 649 FTE
STATE-SIZE GA 400 Facility 652 FTE
CITY-NEAR AUGUSTA COKE 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR AUGUSTA FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR AUGUSTA PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR AU Medical Center, Inc. 5,630 FTE
NAT-TCR Arnott Industries 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Golden Triangle Construction, LLC 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ypsilanti Community Utilities Authority - Administration & Wastewater Operations 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR R+L Carriers - DSM 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE WHQ 650 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kohler Co - Brownwood Vitreous 650 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forcepoint LLC (Austin) 650 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seneca Foods Corporation 650 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.