Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local · California

Frank C. Alegre Trucking, Inc.

Lodi, CA · ~219 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Frank C. Alegre Trucking, Inc. runs at 196% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local workplace, earning a grade D.

Frank C. Alegre Trucking, Inc.: 8.8 TCR = 196% of Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Frank C. Alegre Trucking, Inc. safety composite

Frank C. Alegre Trucking, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2018→2024

Frank C. Alegre Trucking, Inc. injury rate improved

Frank C. Alegre Trucking, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.0 from 9.3 in 2018 to 7.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.3 · 2019=11.3 · 2020=8.8 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=8.0 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=7.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · Lodi, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.8 · 196% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #93/110
  • PHOTO Al Warren Oil - Chic…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 137 inj
  • SIZE ~219 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Al Warren Oil - Chicago (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Frank C. Alegre Trucking, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Frank C. Alegre Trucking, Inc. averages 8.8 TCR (196% of the Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Frank C. Alegre Trucking, Inc. TCR series: 2018=9.3 · 2019=11.3 · 2020=8.8 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=8 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=7.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Frank C. Alegre Trucking, Inc. falls in its industry

1,130 Trucking, specialized freight establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #93 safest of 110 Trucking, specialized freight employers in California.

Frank C. Alegre Trucking, Inc. (219 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Frank C. Alegre Trucking, Inc.
Frank C. Alegre Trucking, Inc. (219 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Frank C. Alegre Trucking, Inc. has more employees than the Trucking, specialized freight (except us median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.3 5.3 16 2 0
2023 8.7 6.1 18 2 0
2022 8.0 7.6 18 2 0
2021 8.3 6.6 19 1 0
2020 8.8 7.1 21 0 0
2019 11.3 8.1 25 0 0
2018 9.3 7.0 20 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · CA · Lodi

1,130 Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 140 employers in Lodi, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Al Warren Oil - Chicago 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harvest Distribution, Inc. 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wendel Poultry Service Inc. 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9613-0308 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gilroy Location 219 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mellano & Company dba Mellano Enterprises SLR 219 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Garlic Company 219 FTE
STATE-SIZE Statewide Labor Corporation 219 FTE
CITY-NEAR Perez Farming Services Inc. 1,145 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9292-AHLM001 - HOSPITAL 1,030 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-223 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 592 890 FTE
NAT-TCR Alaris Health at West Orange 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kamps Pallets Deerfield Beach 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakefront Clinic Building 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR TheraCare Home Health - Cantex Home Health Beaumont LLC 8.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Advantage Technical 219 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gershwin Theatre 219 FTE
NAT-SIZE AccuformNMC 219 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trailer Component Manufacturing - 3UL 8200 219 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.