Grape farming without making wine · California

Perez Farming Services Inc.

Lodi, CA · ~1,145 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Perez Farming Services Inc. runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Grape farming without making wine workplace, earning a grade A.

Perez Farming Services Inc.: 1.4 TCR = 31% of Grape farming without making wine BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Perez Farming Services Inc. safety composite

Perez Farming Services Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2017→2024

Perez Farming Services Inc. injury rate improved

Perez Farming Services Inc.'s TCR fell 1.1 from 2.2 in 2017 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.2 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111332 · Lodi, CA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #17/151
  • PHOTO Deaver Ranch Inc
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~1,145 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Deaver Ranch Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Perez Farming Services Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Perez Farming Services Inc. averages 1.4 TCR (31% of the Grape farming without making wine BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Perez Farming Services Inc. TCR series: 2017=2.2 · 2022=2 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Perez Farming Services Inc. falls in its industry

162 Grape farming without making w establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 151 Grape farming without making w employers in California.

Perez Farming Services Inc. (1,145 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Perez Farming Services Inc.
Perez Farming Services Inc. (1,145 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Perez Farming Services Inc. has more employees than the Grape farming without making wine median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.3 4 0 0
2023 0.2 0.2 3 0 0
2022 2.0 2.0 5 0 0
2017 2.2 0.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111332 · CA · Lodi

162 Grape farming without making wine employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 140 employers in Lodi, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Deaver Ranch Inc 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR AJ Farm Labor Services, Inc 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3469_6645 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR K&I Ag Inc 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sutter Santa Rosa Regional Hospital (274-SR-SRH) 1,145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk 1,144 FTE
STATE-SIZE ABS-0029-0028-06758 FAC-06758-BREA-CA 1,143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Loma Linda University Medical Center Murrieta 1,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9292-AHLM001 - HOSPITAL 1,030 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-223 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 592 890 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 344 779 FTE
NAT-TCR GRAD New Haven 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR FDM Associates Inc - SFS 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Caskey 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Colorado State University Pueblo 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mclaren Oakland 1,145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Temperanceville Plant 1,145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norwood Medical 1,145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sanderson Farms St. Pauls Processing 1,145 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.