Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Texas

Frank M Tejeda

Floresville, TX · ~139 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Frank M Tejeda runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade A.

Frank M Tejeda: 3.1 TCR = 48% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Frank M Tejeda safety composite

Frank M Tejeda scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 1.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Frank M Tejeda: 0.0 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 7.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.34× in 2024

Frank M Tejeda's TCR rose 2.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Floresville, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 3.1 · 48% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #349/1034
  • PHOTO General Baptist Nurs…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~139 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: General Baptist Nursing Home of Piggott (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Frank M Tejeda in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Frank M Tejeda averages 3.1 TCR (48% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Frank M Tejeda TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Frank M Tejeda falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #349 safest of 1034 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Texas.

Frank M Tejeda (139 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Frank M Tejeda
Frank M Tejeda (139 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Frank M Tejeda has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 1.1 2 0 0
2023 4.6 3.5 4 0 0
2022 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 3.7 2.5 3 0 0
2020 7.7 2.5 6 3 0
2019 3.4 0.0 2 0 0
2018 1.6 0.0 2 0 0
2017 4.1 1.6 5 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · TX · Floresville

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 22 employers in Floresville, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR General Baptist Nursing Home of Piggott 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northbrook Healthcare Center 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manor Care Health Services - Sarasota 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Briar Place Nursing 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE ELP-GROUND OPS 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE ITC Texas 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4054-ABS-0017-0016-02016 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6400-SWY-0020-0020-03621 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR 465 218 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 465 216 FTE
CITY-NEAR Floresville Residence & Rehabilitation Center 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR F&W Electrical Contractors, Inc. 95 FTE
NAT-TCR Harvard Maintenance Inc. of New Jersey 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Corner Market#6058 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gaughan South LLC dba South Point Hotel & Casino 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Tappahanock 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brandon Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE KKS 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manitowoc Cranes Inc- Manitowoc, WI 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rocky Brands Distribution Center 139 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.