Folding boxes (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard · Ohio

Franklin Ave

Shelby, OH · ~109 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Franklin Ave runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Folding boxes (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

Franklin Ave: 4.0 TCR = 121% of Folding boxes (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Franklin Ave safety composite

Franklin Ave scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2017→2024

Franklin Ave injury rate improved

Franklin Ave's TCR fell 2.4 from 5.7 in 2017 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.7 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322212 · Shelby, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 121% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #15/17
  • PHOTO Diamond Paper Box Co…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Diamond Paper Box Company, dba Diamond Packaging (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Franklin Ave in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Franklin Ave averages 4.0 TCR (121% of the Folding boxes (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Franklin Ave TCR series: 2017=5.7 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Franklin Ave falls in its industry

205 Folding boxes (except corrugat establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 17 Folding boxes (except corrugat employers in Ohio.

Franklin Ave (109 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Franklin Ave
Franklin Ave (109 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Franklin Ave has fewer employees than the Folding boxes (except corrugated) made f median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 3.3 4 0 0
2023 2.4 0.8 1 2 0
2022 4.2 2.8 6 0 0
2021 4.8 4.8 6 0 0
2020 2.8 1.4 4 0 0
2019 5.8 3.6 8 0 0
2018 2.9 1.9 3 0 0
2017 5.7 2.9 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322212 · OH · Shelby

205 Folding boxes (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 26 employers in Shelby, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Diamond Paper Box Company, dba Diamond Packaging 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prystup Packaging Products-Main 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Concord NH 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autajon Boston Inc. 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE GEM Industrial Inc - Ardagh/Project Bluewave 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Don Wartko Construction, Inc. 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE All-Temp Refrigeration Inc 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE TFH-EB Inc. dba The Waterworks 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Shelby 663 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Tubular Products - Shelby 637 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Tubular Products USA LLC 594 FTE
CITY-NEAR MTD Products Inc 385 FTE
NAT-TCR Butte County Rice Growers Association 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Strick Trailers, LLC 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TRANSPORTATION 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 4 B Farms, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main Office 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gaines and company Inc 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spooner's Woodworks Inc. 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wadesboro 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.