Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel · Ohio

ArcelorMittal Shelby

Shelby, OH · ~663 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ArcelorMittal Shelby runs at 144% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel workplace, earning a grade D.

ArcelorMittal Shelby: 4.7 TCR = 144% of Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ArcelorMittal Shelby safety composite

ArcelorMittal Shelby scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2019

ArcelorMittal Shelby injury rate improved

ArcelorMittal Shelby's TCR fell 0.7 from 5.3 in 2016 to 4.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.3 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Shelby, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 144% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #15/34
  • PHOTO Eagle Tubular Products
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 132 inj
  • SIZE ~663 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eagle Tubular Products (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

ArcelorMittal Shelby in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ArcelorMittal Shelby averages 4.7 TCR (144% of the Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ArcelorMittal Shelby TCR series: 2016=5.3 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=4.7 · BLS 3.3

Where ArcelorMittal Shelby falls in its industry

329 Tubing, mechanical and hypoder establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 34 Tubing, mechanical and hypoder employers in Ohio.

ArcelorMittal Shelby (663 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate ArcelorMittal Shelby
ArcelorMittal Shelby (663 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

ArcelorMittal Shelby has more employees than the Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.7 2.2 32 2 0
2018 5.7 3.1 41 5 0
2017 3.3 2.6 24 1 0
2016 5.3 3.5 35 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · OH · Shelby

329 Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 26 employers in Shelby, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eagle Tubular Products 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NEHP 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PREMIER DRILL PRODUCTS, LLC 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR W-W Livestock Systems 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Perry 663 FTE
STATE-SIZE Victoria's Secret & Company Distribution Center 6 663 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shelly and Sands Inc. 664 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gambrinus Steel Plant 665 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Tubular Products - Shelby 637 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Tubular Products USA LLC 594 FTE
CITY-NEAR MTD Products Inc 385 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHELBY MFG 305 MANSFIELD AVE 349 FTE
NAT-TCR Pap Lafayette 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Insul-Flow, Inc.- CA 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MN,BEMIDJI - Medical Center Campus - Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Senior Care of Meadow Creek 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kershaw Health Hospital 663 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cheraw II 663 FTE
NAT-SIZE McCorvey Sheet Metal Works, LP 663 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Nevell Group 663 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.