Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Franklin Feed and Supply Company

Chambersburg, PA · ~50 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Franklin Feed and Supply Company runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Franklin Feed and Supply Company: 1.4 TCR = 36% of Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing BLS 3.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Franklin Feed and Supply Company safety composite

Franklin Feed and Supply Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Franklin Feed and Supply Company held a steady TCR band

Franklin Feed and Supply Company's TCR held near 0.1 from 2.2 in 2018 to 2.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311119 · Chambersburg, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/42
  • PHOTO Turlock Feed Mill
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Turlock Feed Mill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Franklin Feed and Supply Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Franklin Feed and Supply Company averages 1.4 TCR (36% of the Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Franklin Feed and Supply Company TCR series: 2018=2.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.1 · BLS 3.9

Where Franklin Feed and Supply Company falls in its industry

756 Animal feed mills (except dog establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 42 Animal feed mills (except dog employers in Pennsylvania.

Franklin Feed and Supply Company (50 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Franklin Feed and Supply Company
Franklin Feed and Supply Company (50 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Franklin Feed and Supply Company has more employees than the Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311119 · PA · Chambersburg

756 Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 144 employers in Chambersburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Turlock Feed Mill 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCS Phosphate Company Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bushnell Feed Mill 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cargill Animal Nutrition - Casa Grande 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE To-Jo Food Products Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kulp Family Dairy LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maronda Homes Inc of Pennsylvania 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Home Remodeling Pros of Central PA 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chambersburg Hospital 2,034 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellSpan Chambersburg Hospital 2,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0589 - Chambersburg PA DC 1,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0589 - Chambersburg DC 1,049 FTE
NAT-TCR International Airport Luis Munoz Marin 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Modern Piping Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Summerhouse Condominiums 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Arthur Plant 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chatanooga 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Middle Construction 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Product Solutions Anaheim 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indio Location 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.