Print shops, letterpress (except printing books) · Pennsylvania

Fres-co System USA

Telford, PA · ~394 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fres-co System USA runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Print shops, letterpress (except printing books) workplace, earning a grade B.

Fres-co System USA: 2.5 TCR = 77% of Print shops, letterpress (except printing books) BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fres-co System USA safety composite

Fres-co System USA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Fres-co System USA held a steady TCR band

Fres-co System USA's TCR held near 0.3 from 2.1 in 2017 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.1 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Telford, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #42/110
  • PHOTO Automated Graphics S…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 70 inj
  • SIZE ~394 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Automated Graphics Systems (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Fres-co System USA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fres-co System USA averages 2.5 TCR (77% of the Print shops, letterpress (except printing books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fres-co System USA TCR series: 2017=2.1 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Fres-co System USA falls in its industry

2,001 Print shops, letterpress (exce establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 110 Print shops, letterpress (exce employers in Pennsylvania.

Fres-co System USA (394 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Fres-co System USA
Fres-co System USA (394 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Fres-co System USA has more employees than the Print shops, letterpress (except printin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 1.7 7 0 0
2023 1.5 0.9 5 0 0
2022 2.4 2.1 9 0 0
2021 1.7 1.4 6 0 0
2020 2.6 1.1 10 0 0
2019 4.3 3.2 15 1 0
2018 3.3 2.7 10 2 0
2017 2.1 2.1 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · PA · Telford

2,001 Print shops, letterpress (except printing books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 37 employers in Telford, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Automated Graphics Systems 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR DW Acquisition LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unimac KPS, LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Street Checks, Inc. 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fairless Hills DC 394 FTE
STATE-SIZE FLSmidth Inc. 394 FTE
STATE-SIZE Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC - 021 394 FTE
STATE-SIZE R. M. Palmer Company - Building #3 395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Draeger, Inc. - Telford 481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lutheran Community at Telford 328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Draeger Medical Systems, Inc. - Telford 231 FTE
CITY-NEAR Secant Group 176 FTE
NAT-TCR Tiffin 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Warren Stamping Plant 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Paul F. Vitale, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR FLORIDA UNDERGROUND SERVICES, LLC dba MTI EQUIPMENT 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Memphis, TN - 4949 Tuggle Road 394 FTE
NAT-SIZE P&S Transportation Birmingham, AL 394 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barriere Construction Co., L.L.C. 394 FTE
NAT-SIZE Social Services 394 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.