ALL printing operations including digital printing · Maryland

Automated Graphics Systems

White Plains, MD · ~74 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Automated Graphics Systems runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical ALL printing operations including digital printing workplace, earning a grade B.

Automated Graphics Systems: 2.5 TCR = 77% of ALL printing operations including digital printing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Automated Graphics Systems safety composite

Automated Graphics Systems scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2024

Automated Graphics Systems injury rate improved

Automated Graphics Systems's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.0 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=1.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · White Plains, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/24
  • PHOTO Fres-co System USA
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fres-co System USA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Automated Graphics Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Automated Graphics Systems averages 2.5 TCR (77% of the ALL printing operations including digital printing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Automated Graphics Systems TCR series: 2016=1 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=3 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=1.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Automated Graphics Systems falls in its industry

2,001 ALL printing operations includ establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 24 ALL printing operations includ employers in Maryland.

Automated Graphics Systems (74 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Automated Graphics Systems
Automated Graphics Systems (74 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Automated Graphics Systems has fewer employees than the ALL printing operations including digita median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 1 1 0
2020 4.6 3.0 3 0 0
2019 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2018 3.0 3.0 3 0 0
2017 4.5 3.4 4 0 0
2016 1.0 1.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · MD · White Plains

2,001 ALL printing operations including digital printing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 16 employers in White Plains, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fres-co System USA 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR DW Acquisition LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unimac KPS, LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Street Checks, Inc. 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chillum Station 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Consolidated Commercial Services, LLC 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Warfield & Sanford, Inc. 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Insualtion, Inc. 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Restore Health Rehabilitation Center 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Outside The Box Logistics LLC 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR 126 Charles County Md 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR 126 - Charles County Md 90 FTE
NAT-TCR Daltile Gettysburg 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Quality Manufacturing Corporation 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites Alexandria 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant 36 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Crown Lift Trucks San Antonio 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Young'S Environmental Cleanup, Inc. 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pioneer Coach, LLC 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bangor 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.