Homes for the elderly with nursing care · Maryland

Friends House Retirement Community, Inc.

Sandy Spring, MD · ~138 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Friends House Retirement Community, Inc. runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade C.

Friends House Retirement Community, Inc.: 6.2 TCR = 95% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Friends House Retirement Community, Inc. safety composite

Friends House Retirement Community, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2017→2023

Friends House Retirement Community, Inc. injury rate improved

Friends House Retirement Community, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.4 from 6.9 in 2017 to 4.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.9 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=6.4 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Sandy Spring, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.2 · 95% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #77/176
  • PHOTO Heritage Manor of Ba…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~138 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heritage Manor of Baton Rouge II (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Friends House Retirement Community, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Friends House Retirement Community, Inc. averages 6.2 TCR (95% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Friends House Retirement Community, Inc. TCR series: 2017=6.9 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=6.4 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=4.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Friends House Retirement Community, Inc. falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #77 safest of 176 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in Maryland.

Friends House Retirement Community, Inc. (138 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Friends House Retirement Community, Inc.
Friends House Retirement Community, Inc. (138 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Friends House Retirement Community, Inc. has more employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.5 1.8 3 2 0
2022 7.9 4.0 8 0 0
2019 6.4 3.6 7 0 0
2018 5.3 2.7 6 0 0
2017 6.9 2.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MD · Sandy Spring

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 4 employers in Sandy Spring, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heritage Manor of Baton Rouge II 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Women's Welsh Clubs of America 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Joseph's Manor 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Cottages at Garden Grove 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rosedale Roofing Company, Inc. 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARK Systems, Inc. 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Access Demolition Contracting, Inc. 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAPP Cambridge - 006 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brooke Grove Retirement Village 407 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nichols Contracting Inc 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR BROOKE GROVE FOUNDATION 44 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - OAK7 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Vintage on the Ponds 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR AdventHealth Care Center Zephyrhills North 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5327 Tallahassee, FL 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Boltex Manufacturing Company Inc 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stow Road Offices 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE SUPERIOR PLUS - Corporate offices 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fort Valley, Georgia 138 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.