Continuing care retirement communities · Maryland

Brooke Grove Retirement Village

Sandy Spring, MD · ~407 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brooke Grove Retirement Village runs at 268% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brooke Grove Retirement Village: 10.2 TCR = 268% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brooke Grove Retirement Village safety composite

Brooke Grove Retirement Village scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 41% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.8

2020→2024

Brooke Grove Retirement Village injury rate improved

Brooke Grove Retirement Village's TCR fell 17.8 from 22.9 in 2020 to 5.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 22.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=22.9 · 2021=13.7 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Sandy Spring, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.2 · 268% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #67/87
  • PHOTO Westminster St Augus…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 82 inj
  • SIZE ~407 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Westminster St Augustine (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Brooke Grove Retirement Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brooke Grove Retirement Village averages 10.2 TCR (268% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brooke Grove Retirement Village TCR series: 2020=22.9 · 2021=13.7 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=5.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Brooke Grove Retirement Village falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 87 Continuing care retirement com employers in Maryland.

Brooke Grove Retirement Village (407 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Brooke Grove Retirement Village
Brooke Grove Retirement Village (407 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Brooke Grove Retirement Village has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.1 4.5 14 1 0
2023 4.4 2.8 11 0 0
2022 4.7 3.6 12 0 0
2021 13.7 10.4 24 10 0
2020 22.9 17.3 21 44 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MD · Sandy Spring

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 4 employers in Sandy Spring, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Westminster St Augustine 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR LifeServices - Hawthorne Woods 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Woods at Holly Tree 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wentworth at the Meadows II 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 3720 407 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wegmans Bel Air 053 406 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wegmans Woodmore 040 406 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paul Reed Smith Guitars 405 FTE
CITY-NEAR Friends House Retirement Community, Inc. 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nichols Contracting Inc 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR BROOKE GROVE FOUNDATION 44 FTE
NAT-TCR Banker Insulation - New Mexico Branch 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pomeroy Living Rochester Assisted Living & Memory Care 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR A&L Wood Inc. 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Seattle WA FXFE-SEA 10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE North Clarendon 407 FTE
NAT-SIZE Traeger Pellet Grills, LLC 407 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premiere Building Maintenance Corporation 407 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alabama Cleaning Service 407 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.