624120 Services for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities · Florida

Friendship Centers, Sarasota

Sarasota, FL · ~40 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Friendship Centers, Sarasota runs at 482% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical 624120 Services for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Friendship Centers, Sarasota: 18.3 TCR = 482% of 624120 Services for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Friendship Centers, Sarasota safety composite

Friendship Centers, Sarasota scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.3

2016→2017

Friendship Centers, Sarasota injury rate improved

Friendship Centers, Sarasota's TCR fell 10.3 from 23.5 in 2016 to 13.2 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 23.5 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=23.5 · 2017=13.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Sarasota, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.3 · 482% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #20/21
  • PHOTO United Cerebral Pals…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: United Cerebral Palsy of Georgia-Conyers Day (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Friendship Centers, Sarasota in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Friendship Centers, Sarasota averages 18.3 TCR (482% of the 624120 Services for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Friendship Centers, Sarasota TCR series: 2016=23.5 · 2017=13.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Friendship Centers, Sarasota falls in its industry

1,320 624120 Services for the Elderl establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 21 624120 Services for the Elderl employers in Florida.

Friendship Centers, Sarasota (40 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Friendship Centers, Sarasota
Friendship Centers, Sarasota (40 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Friendship Centers, Sarasota has fewer employees than the 624120 Services for the Elderly and Pers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 13.2 2.6 4 1 0
2016 23.5 11.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · FL · Sarasota

1,320 624120 Services for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 504 employers in Sarasota, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR United Cerebral Palsy of Georgia-Conyers Day 18.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gardner Day Habiitation Program 18.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benchmark-MT 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plymouth CCI 18.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Triple D Farm 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE IMG Citrus Happy Food 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Village farms Heathrow Florida 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Villages Grown Farm 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beneva Lakes 3,238 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Butterfly- Lakewood Ranch 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Connexis Physicians 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Treasures Thrift Shop II 2,476 FTE
NAT-TCR Wasilla Retirement LLC dba Primrose of Wasilla 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Richfield S.T.E.M. School 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Water Reclamation (Sanitation) 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR ACI West Bend 18.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Land Jet Inc 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Odessa LLC 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE RailWorks Transit 63rd Street 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5029 St. Joseph Hospital 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.