Condensed milk manufacturing · New York

FrieslandCampina Ingredients North America- Delhi

Delhi, NY · ~118 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FrieslandCampina Ingredients North America- Delhi runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Condensed milk manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

FrieslandCampina Ingredients North America- Delhi: 4.9 TCR = 149% of Condensed milk manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FrieslandCampina Ingredients North America- Delhi safety composite

FrieslandCampina Ingredients North America- Delhi scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2016→2020

FrieslandCampina Ingredients North America- Delhi injury rate improved

FrieslandCampina Ingredients North America- Delhi's TCR fell 4.7 from 7.9 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.9 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311514 · Delhi, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 149% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #6/8
  • PHOTO Super Store Industri…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Super Store Industries Turlock (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

FrieslandCampina Ingredients North America- Delhi in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FrieslandCampina Ingredients North America- Delhi averages 4.9 TCR (149% of the Condensed milk manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FrieslandCampina Ingredients North America- Delhi TCR series: 2016=7.9 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where FrieslandCampina Ingredients North America- Delhi falls in its industry

185 Condensed milk manufacturing establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 8 Condensed milk manufacturing employers in New York.

FrieslandCampina Ingredients North America- Delhi (118 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate FrieslandCampina Ingredients North America- Delhi
FrieslandCampina Ingredients North America- Delhi (118 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 3.5

FrieslandCampina Ingredients North America- Delhi has more employees than the Condensed milk manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.3 2.4 4 0 0
2019 5.9 3.4 6 1 0
2018 4.7 2.4 5 1 0
2017 2.7 0.7 3 1 0
2016 7.9 1.6 6 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311514 · NY · Delhi

185 Condensed milk manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 9 employers in Delhi, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Super Store Industries Turlock 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jackson, WI. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Visalia Processing Plant 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant Three 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crist Bros. Orchards, Inc. 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lamb FArms Inc 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE NYSEG Binghamton ECC 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Nyack, NY 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saputo Dairy Foods USA 244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saputo Dairy Foods 196 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delhi 181 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delhi Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 160 FTE
NAT-TCR Ft. Wayne Hospice 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR WonderWorks Tennessee 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 224 Milpitas, Ca 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 400 Huntsville, Al 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stivers Ford Lincoln 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Belaire Health Care Center 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE UTC Railcar Repair Services - Texarkana, AR 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fabtech 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.