Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers · Michigan

Fritz Enterprises Taylor

Taylor, MI · ~34 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fritz Enterprises Taylor runs at 275% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Fritz Enterprises Taylor: 6.1 TCR = 275% of Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fritz Enterprises Taylor safety composite

Fritz Enterprises Taylor scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2024

Fritz Enterprises Taylor injury rate improved

Fritz Enterprises Taylor's TCR fell 3.9 from 6.6 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.6 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=8.5 · 2021=8.4 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=8.2 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Taylor, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.1 · 275% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #44/62
  • PHOTO Palm Beach Metal, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Palm Beach Metal, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Fritz Enterprises Taylor in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fritz Enterprises Taylor averages 6.1 TCR (275% of the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fritz Enterprises Taylor TCR series: 2016=6.6 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=8.5 · 2021=8.4 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=8.2 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 2.2

Where Fritz Enterprises Taylor falls in its industry

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automot establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 62 Scrap materials (e.g., automot employers in Michigan.

Fritz Enterprises Taylor (34 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Fritz Enterprises Taylor
Fritz Enterprises Taylor (34 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Fritz Enterprises Taylor has fewer employees than the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, indus median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 8.2 5.5 3 0 0
2022 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2021 8.4 5.6 3 0 0
2020 8.5 8.5 3 0 0
2019 4.8 2.4 2 0 0
2018 6.5 2.2 3 0 0
2017 6.1 6.1 2 0 0
2016 6.6 3.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · MI · Taylor

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 116 employers in Taylor, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Palm Beach Metal, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Consolidated Resources, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3118 Chattanooga Recycle 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Tire Recycling - Midlothian, TX 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE GS Ashley LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sportel Greenhouses, LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coldwater 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dearborn Industrial Generation LLC 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Detroit 1,670 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2250-5 1,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR Team Solutions Corporate US 528 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2912 435 FTE
NAT-TCR Truckrite Transport 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sanderson Farms Kinston Processing 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Clemens House 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Conway SC Yard 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE DeRoyal Foam/Converting 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Creative Care 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mogadore 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Excel Garden - Grand Prairie 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.