Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Wisconsin

Frontier Ag & Turf, New Richmond

New Richmond, WI · ~51 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.7
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Frontier Ag & Turf, New Richmond runs at 602% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Frontier Ag & Turf, New Richmond: 12.7 TCR = 602% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Frontier Ag & Turf, New Richmond safety composite

Frontier Ag & Turf, New Richmond scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Frontier Ag & Turf, New Richmond: 8.4 → 16.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 16.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.19× in 2018

Frontier Ag & Turf, New Richmond's TCR rose 8.5 from 8.4 in 2017 to 16.9 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · New Richmond, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.7 · 602% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #87/87
  • PHOTO Heritage Foodservice…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heritage Foodservice-South Florida (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Frontier Ag & Turf, New Richmond in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Frontier Ag & Turf, New Richmond averages 12.7 TCR (602% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Frontier Ag & Turf, New Richmond TCR series: 2017=8.4 · 2018=16.9 · BLS 2.1

Where Frontier Ag & Turf, New Richmond falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 87 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Wisconsin.

Frontier Ag & Turf, New Richmond (51 employees, TCR 12.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Frontier Ag & Turf, New Richmond
Frontier Ag & Turf, New Richmond (51 employees, TCR 12.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Frontier Ag & Turf, New Richmond has more employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 16.9 2.4 6 1 0
2017 8.4 1.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · WI · New Richmond

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 33 employers in New Richmond, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heritage Foodservice-South Florida 12.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Parts - Kansas City 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pappas Landscaping Greenhouse 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quality Refrigeration, Inc. 12.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Biddick, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delafield 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.F. Tomasini Contractors, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kraemer North America - Iowa - All Others 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phillips Medisize Corporation - Phillips Medical New Richmond 450 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Richmond Westfields Hospital 417 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5432 411 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5432 305 FTE
NAT-TCR Main Office 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR IAC Acoustics a Division of Sound Seal 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fire Department 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Co 19 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. 12.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Valeo North America Inc - Thermal Front End Module - Canton 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Legends - Hollywood Casino SL 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE PA010 - Pauley Construction - Brighton 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE George's Springdale Grow Out 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.