Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial warehouse · California

Fullmer Construction

Ontario, CA · ~187 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fullmer Construction runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial warehouse workplace, earning a grade C.

Fullmer Construction: 2.4 TCR = 83% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial warehouse BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fullmer Construction safety composite

Fullmer Construction scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2017→2024

Fullmer Construction injury rate improved

Fullmer Construction's TCR fell 1.7 from 3.3 in 2017 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.3 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=5.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Ontario, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 83% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #240/486
  • PHOTO American Constructor…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~187 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: American Constructors, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Fullmer Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fullmer Construction averages 2.4 TCR (83% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial warehouse BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fullmer Construction TCR series: 2017=3.3 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=5.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=2 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 2.9

Where Fullmer Construction falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #240 safest of 486 Addition, alteration and renov employers in California.

Fullmer Construction (187 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Fullmer Construction
Fullmer Construction (187 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Fullmer Construction has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 0.8 2 0 0
2023 2.0 1.3 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.3 5.3 4 3 0
2019 2.4 1.6 3 0 0
2017 3.3 2.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · Ontario

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial warehouse employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR American Constructors, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR JP Cullen & Sons 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charles Service and Equipment 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cook Polymer Technology 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gourmet Specialties Inc - Warehouse 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE J & C Ag Services Inc 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miramar - Bld: 5315 - 01 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-Ventura S/C 187 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR Van Born 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR DTM Distributors 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Worcester Manufacturing 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 8519 Mission 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mt Vernon 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE BNAI BRITH Home & Hospital for the Aged, Inc. 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Food Stores 6051 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Food Stores 6074 187 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.