Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) · Indiana

Cook Polymer Technology

Bloomington, IN · ~425 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cook Polymer Technology runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) workplace, earning a grade C.

Cook Polymer Technology: 2.4 TCR = 83% of Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) BLS 2.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cook Polymer Technology safety composite

Cook Polymer Technology scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cook Polymer Technology: 1.2 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 3.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.68× in 2024

Cook Polymer Technology's TCR rose 0.7 from 1.2 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Bloomington, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 83% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #53/93
  • PHOTO American Constructor…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~425 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: American Constructors, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Cook Polymer Technology in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cook Polymer Technology averages 2.4 TCR (83% of the Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cook Polymer Technology TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2018=3.6 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 2.9

Where Cook Polymer Technology falls in its industry

4,692 Warehouse construction (e.g., establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 93 Warehouse construction (e.g., employers in Indiana.

Cook Polymer Technology (425 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Cook Polymer Technology
Cook Polymer Technology (425 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Cook Polymer Technology has more employees than the Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.6 6 1 0
2023 2.5 1.9 8 1 0
2022 2.9 1.4 12 0 0
2018 3.6 3.3 13 0 0
2016 1.2 1.2 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · IN · Bloomington

4,692 Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 204 employers in Bloomington, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR American Constructors, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR JP Cullen & Sons 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charles Service and Equipment 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fullmer Construction 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE HONEYWELL AEROSPACE 425 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flaherty & Collins Inc 425 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indianapolis Zoo 425 FTE
STATE-SIZE IEA-C 424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Incorporated Park 48 3,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Inc 2,976 FTE
CITY-NEAR CI-P48 2,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bloomington 2,251 FTE
NAT-TCR Jonaco Machine 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Worth Botanic Garden 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR A & B Painting, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR New Mexico Oncology Hematology Consultants, Ltd.. 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Leland Management, Inc. 425 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grays Harbor County 425 FTE
NAT-SIZE RHE HatCo Inc 425 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carson City Correctional Facility 425 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.