Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing · Mississippi

Future Foam Inc.

Tupelo, MS · ~74 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Future Foam Inc. runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Future Foam Inc.: 2.2 TCR = 68% of Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Future Foam Inc. safety composite

Future Foam Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Future Foam Inc.: 0.0 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 3.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.08× in 2024

Future Foam Inc.'s TCR rose 2.4 from 0.0 in 2020 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · Tupelo, MS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 68% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #10/23
  • PHOTO Albert Lea Plant
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Albert Lea Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Future Foam Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Future Foam Inc. averages 2.2 TCR (68% of the Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Future Foam Inc. TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Future Foam Inc. falls in its industry

474 Cushions, carpet and rug, uret establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 23 Cushions, carpet and rug, uret employers in Mississippi.

Future Foam Inc. (74 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Future Foam Inc.
Future Foam Inc. (74 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Future Foam Inc. has fewer employees than the Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and o median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2023 3.6 2.4 3 0 0
2022 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 3.7 1.2 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · MS · Tupelo

474 Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 144 employers in Tupelo, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Albert Lea Plant 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Creative Foam - E&D 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Foam Fabricators of Minnesota 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pregis - Wurtland 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE South St. Office 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Natchez Trace Electric Power Association 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alcorn County Electric Power Association 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Malouf Construction LLC 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Mississippi Medical Center 5,727 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tupelo Cooper Tire & Rubber Plant (SIC 3011) 1,416 FTE
CITY-NEAR JESCO, Inc. 394 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tupelo Operations 393 FTE
NAT-TCR M. Schneider Soap & Chemical Co., Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Knauf Insulation Plant 4 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hubbell Power Systems - Centralia Operation 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 1807 - Asheville 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cemplex Group Texas, LLC 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coconis Furniture 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Usac Wa LLC 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C391 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.