Manufacturer of Wool Fiberglass Insulation · California

Knauf Insulation Plant 4

Shasta Lake, CA · ~150 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Knauf Insulation Plant 4 runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Manufacturer of Wool Fiberglass Insulation workplace, earning a grade B.

Knauf Insulation Plant 4: 2.2 TCR = 68% of Manufacturer of Wool Fiberglass Insulation BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Knauf Insulation Plant 4 safety composite

Knauf Insulation Plant 4 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Knauf Insulation Plant 4: 1.9 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.85× in 2024

Knauf Insulation Plant 4's TCR rose 1.3 from 1.9 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327993 · Shasta Lake, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 68% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Nutec Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~150 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nutec Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Knauf Insulation Plant 4 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Knauf Insulation Plant 4 averages 2.2 TCR (68% of the Manufacturer of Wool Fiberglass Insulation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Knauf Insulation Plant 4 TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Knauf Insulation Plant 4 falls in its industry

101 Manufacturer of Wool Fiberglas establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Manufacturer of Wool Fiberglas employers in California.

Knauf Insulation Plant 4 (150 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Knauf Insulation Plant 4
Knauf Insulation Plant 4 (150 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Knauf Insulation Plant 4 has more employees than the Manufacturer of Wool Fiberglass Insulati median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 1.9 5 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.8 1.2 3 0 0
2021 3.9 1.3 6 0 0
2020 1.3 0.6 2 0 0
2019 4.4 2.5 7 0 0
2018 1.9 1.9 3 0 0
2017 1.9 1.3 2 1 0
2016 1.9 1.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327993 · CA · Shasta Lake

101 Manufacturer of Wool Fiberglass Insulation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 4 employers in Shasta Lake, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nutec Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Knauf Insulation Plant 1 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR USG Interiors Cloquet 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CTA Acoustics, Inc 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Klink Citrus Association 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Javier Ponce Nevarez 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mashburn Transportation Services 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE TRI Pointe Homes 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPI- Shasta Lake 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sierra Pacific Industries - Shasta Lake Division 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5175 Fresenius Medical Care 39 FTE
NAT-TCR Hubbell Power Systems - Centralia Operation 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR M. Schneider Soap & Chemical Co., Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Country Meadows Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Future Foam Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hoosier Tank 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bella Terra Streamwood 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2561-Marriott Louisville 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aviation Technical Services Texas 150 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.