Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing · Utah

Future Foam - Plant 12

West Valley City, UT · ~42 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Future Foam - Plant 12 runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Future Foam - Plant 12: 3.4 TCR = 103% of Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Future Foam - Plant 12 safety composite

Future Foam - Plant 12 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2024

Future Foam - Plant 12 injury rate improved

Future Foam - Plant 12's TCR fell 1.6 from 4.6 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · West Valley City, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 103% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK P46
  • PHOTO Fogelsville Pouring …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fogelsville Pouring Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Future Foam - Plant 12 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Future Foam - Plant 12 averages 3.4 TCR (103% of the Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Future Foam - Plant 12 TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=0 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Future Foam - Plant 12 falls in its industry

474 Cushions, carpet and rug, uret establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Future Foam - Plant 12 (42 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Future Foam - Plant 12
Future Foam - Plant 12 (42 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Future Foam - Plant 12 has fewer employees than the Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and o median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2022 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 9.7 9.7 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.8 4.8 2 0 0
2016 4.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · UT · West Valley City

474 Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 128 employers in West Valley City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fogelsville Pouring Plant 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Archbald 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rogers Corporation EMS-W 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FoamPartner - Piedmont 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mel Clark Inc. 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Destination Construction LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE BMEI - Utah 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE FX Construction 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Health (30659) 2,443 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Physician Services (480-52) 1,320 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Shared Services (470-9702) 977 FTE
CITY-NEAR USANA Health Services 890 FTE
NAT-TCR Pitt Ohio - Washington 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Oa Manufacturing Inc 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Methodist Rehab Hospital 6787 4080 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Berlin Steel - CT Office 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE DeZavala 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACO Remodeling & Construction, Inc. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE NJ31 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE MH Danville 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.