Urethane foam products manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Archbald

Archbald, PA · ~112 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Archbald runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Urethane foam products manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Archbald: 3.4 TCR = 103% of Urethane foam products manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Archbald safety composite

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Archbald scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2019

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Archbald injury rate improved

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Archbald's TCR fell 0.5 from 3.7 in 2017 to 3.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.7 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · Archbald, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 103% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #12/24
  • PHOTO Fogelsville Pouring …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~112 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fogelsville Pouring Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Archbald in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Archbald averages 3.4 TCR (103% of the Urethane foam products manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Archbald TCR series: 2017=3.7 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Archbald falls in its industry

474 Urethane foam products manufac establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 24 Urethane foam products manufac employers in Pennsylvania.

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Archbald (112 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Archbald
Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Archbald (112 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Archbald has more employees than the Urethane foam products manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.1 2.1 3 0 0
2018 3.4 1.7 4 0 0
2017 3.7 2.2 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · PA · Archbald

474 Urethane foam products manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 11 employers in Archbald, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fogelsville Pouring Plant 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Future Foam - Plant 12 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rogers Corporation EMS-W 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FoamPartner - Piedmont 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Montour, LLC 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Overhead Transmission Center 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar - Philadelphia 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kay Builders 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Archbald Kennedy Dr (1547) 570 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Archbald PA (1547) 527 FTE
CITY-NEAR SIMONA America Industries 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR UGI Archbald 84 FTE
NAT-TCR Plant 1 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ace Hardware Retail Support Center (Moxee) 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR #29 Art Van Clinton Twp 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR BCI Koch Division 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plant 1 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saginaw Senior Care and Rehabilitation Center 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake Mary Health & Rehabilitation Center 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Robling Medical 112 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.