Glass, automotive, made from purchased glass · Ohio

Fuyao Glass America

Moraine, OH · ~1,917 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fuyao Glass America runs at 198% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Glass, automotive, made from purchased glass workplace, earning a grade D.

Fuyao Glass America: 6.5 TCR = 198% of Glass, automotive, made from purchased glass BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fuyao Glass America safety composite

Fuyao Glass America scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.3

2016→2024

Fuyao Glass America injury rate improved

Fuyao Glass America's TCR fell 16.3 from 17.8 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 17.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.8 · 2017=13.1 · 2018=8.9 · 2019=4.0 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327215 · Moraine, OH ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 6.5 · 198% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #31/38
  • PHOTO JAM Architectural Gl…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 990 inj
  • SIZE ~1,917 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JAM Architectural Glass, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Fuyao Glass America in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fuyao Glass America averages 6.5 TCR (198% of the Glass, automotive, made from purchased glass BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fuyao Glass America TCR series: 2016=17.8 · 2017=13.1 · 2018=8.9 · 2019=4 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Fuyao Glass America falls in its industry

441 Glass, automotive, made from p establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 38 Glass, automotive, made from p employers in Ohio.

Fuyao Glass America (1,917 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fuyao Glass America
Fuyao Glass America (1,917 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Fuyao Glass America has more employees than the Glass, automotive, made from purchased g median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.1 35 0 0
2023 1.5 1.2 33 0 0
2022 2.4 1.2 49 0 0
2021 3.2 2.5 54 1 0
2019 4.0 2.2 68 17 0
2018 8.9 6.2 172 1 1
2017 13.1 10.1 270 6 0
2016 17.8 13.8 309 15 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327215 · OH · Moraine

441 Glass, automotive, made from purchased glass employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 35 employers in Moraine, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JAM Architectural Glass, Inc. 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hartung Glass Industries Pueblo CO. 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glass Wholesalers DBA Cristacurva 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cardinal LG - Northeast LG 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Scaheffler Transmissions LLC 1,907 FTE
STATE-SIZE R+L Carriers - WIL 1,903 FTE
STATE-SIZE Licking Memorial Hospital 1,933 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 1,895 FTE
CITY-NEAR DMAX, Ltd. 824 FTE
CITY-NEAR CompuNet Clinical Laboratories 789 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shook Construction - All Jobs Summary 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heidelberg Distributing Dayton 313 FTE
NAT-TCR Essential Botanical Farms LLC - Mona 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Milan Box Corporation 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 0267 - Roseville Douglas Blvd 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR TLD ACE Corporation 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6354-FL20 1,917 FTE
NAT-SIZE Monmouth Medical Center 1,918 FTE
NAT-SIZE University of Maryland St. Joseph Medical Center 1,916 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clear Lake Regional Medical Center 1,918 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.