Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Sharp Packaging by Pregis

Sussex, WI · ~245 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sharp Packaging by Pregis runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Sharp Packaging by Pregis: 1.4 TCR = 42% of Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sharp Packaging by Pregis safety composite

Sharp Packaging by Pregis scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2018→2024

Sharp Packaging by Pregis injury rate improved

Sharp Packaging by Pregis's TCR fell 0.8 from 1.7 in 2018 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.7 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326111 · Sussex, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/34
  • PHOTO Polytex Fibers LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~245 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Polytex Fibers LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Sharp Packaging by Pregis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sharp Packaging by Pregis averages 1.4 TCR (42% of the Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sharp Packaging by Pregis TCR series: 2018=1.7 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=2 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Sharp Packaging by Pregis falls in its industry

322 Bags, plastics film, single wa establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 34 Bags, plastics film, single wa employers in Wisconsin.

Sharp Packaging by Pregis (245 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 118 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Sharp Packaging by Pregis
Sharp Packaging by Pregis (245 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 118 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Sharp Packaging by Pregis has more employees than the Bags, plastics film, single wall or mult median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.0 2 0 0
2023 1.4 0.5 3 0 0
2022 2.0 1.3 6 0 0
2021 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2020 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2019 2.5 2.0 5 0 0
2018 1.7 1.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326111 · WI · Sussex

322 Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 52 employers in Sussex, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Polytex Fibers LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR VILLA RICA NATIONAL (2) 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Bag Inc 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Source One Packaging LLC Main Location 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Genex Field 245 FTE
STATE-SIZE Specialty Cheese Company Inc 245 FTE
STATE-SIZE Royle Printing 245 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maysteel Industries LLC 245 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUSSEX WI 1,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DML2 614 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sussex IM, Inc. 394 FTE
CITY-NEAR BCD Sussex 349 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Toyota Motor Ms Food 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Creighton Univ 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR SC Voc Rehab Laurens 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Inver Hills Community College 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE First Call Quality Services 245 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raycap, Inc. 245 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Garick Group, Inc. 245 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Sacramento 245 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.