Office building construction · Massachusetts

F.W. Madigan Company, Inc

Worcester, MA · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

F.W. Madigan Company, Inc runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Office building construction workplace, earning a grade A.

F.W. Madigan Company, Inc: 0.9 TCR = 30% of Office building construction BLS 2.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

F.W. Madigan Company, Inc safety composite

F.W. Madigan Company, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

F.W. Madigan Company, Inc held a steady TCR band

F.W. Madigan Company, Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=4.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Worcester, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/100
  • PHOTO PENN Acoustics, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PENN Acoustics, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

F.W. Madigan Company, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows F.W. Madigan Company, Inc averages 0.9 TCR (30% of the Office building construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

F.W. Madigan Company, Inc TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=4 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where F.W. Madigan Company, Inc falls in its industry

4,692 Office building construction establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 100 Office building construction employers in Massachusetts.

F.W. Madigan Company, Inc (28 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate F.W. Madigan Company, Inc
F.W. Madigan Company, Inc (28 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

F.W. Madigan Company, Inc has fewer employees than the Office building construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MA · Worcester

4,692 Office building construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 248 employers in Worcester, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PENN Acoustics, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TCCo-CT 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Russell Group 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Boldt Company - Stevens Point, WI 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ocean Spray Carver Receiving Station 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waypoint General Contracting LLC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Masters Touch 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pomeroy & Co., Inc. 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR UMass Memorial Health 12,452 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-813 2,492 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Vincent hospital 1,965 FTE
CITY-NEAR NBC Distributors Inc 1,276 FTE
NAT-TCR Deepwater Corrosion Services 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sergeant's Pet Care Products LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Franklin Nursing Home 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR TownePlace Suites Dubuque Downtown 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Broken Mug LLC 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jacksonville RDC 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cedar Creek Quarries, Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Mt. Vernon IL FIRE DEPARTMENT 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.