Hotels (except casino hotels) · Massachusetts

Residence Inn Marriott North Shore/Danvers

Danvers, MA · ~28 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.4
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Residence Inn Marriott North Shore/Danvers runs at 714% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade F.

Residence Inn Marriott North Shore/Danvers: 21.4 TCR = 714% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Residence Inn Marriott North Shore/Danvers safety composite

Residence Inn Marriott North Shore/Danvers scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2016→2017

Residence Inn Marriott North Shore/Danvers injury rate improved

Residence Inn Marriott North Shore/Danvers's TCR fell 4.1 from 23.4 in 2016 to 19.4 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 23.4 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=23.4 · 2017=19.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Danvers, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.4 · 714% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #203/204
  • PHOTO 743
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 743 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Residence Inn Marriott North Shore/Danvers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Residence Inn Marriott North Shore/Danvers averages 21.4 TCR (714% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Residence Inn Marriott North Shore/Danvers TCR series: 2016=23.4 · 2017=19.4 · BLS 3.0

Where Residence Inn Marriott North Shore/Danvers falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #203 safest of 204 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in Massachusetts.

Residence Inn Marriott North Shore/Danvers (28 employees, TCR 21.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Residence Inn Marriott North Shore/Danvers
Residence Inn Marriott North Shore/Danvers (28 employees, TCR 21.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Residence Inn Marriott North Shore/Danvers has fewer employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 19.4 0.0 0 5 0
2016 23.4 0.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · MA · Danvers

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 119 employers in Danvers, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 743 21.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hilton San Antonio Hill Country Hotel 21.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hyatt House San Jose Airport 21.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bay 7, LP DBA The Rambler Motel 21.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ocean Spray Carver Receiving Station 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waypoint General Contracting LLC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Masters Touch 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pomeroy & Co., Inc. 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Abiomed, Inc. (Danvers HQ) 1,915 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northeast Arc 1,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medtronic-CVG 964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Millipore Sigma 17 Cherry Hill Drive Danvers 943 FTE
NAT-TCR PFEWH05 21.4 TCR
NAT-TCR NHC Springfield 21.4 TCR
NAT-TCR *Willowcrest 21.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Trego/Dugan Aviation Inc Bis 21.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arizona Production Center 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0773 - Enterprise, Al 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0445 - Murrieta, Ca 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0196 - Albany, Ny 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.