Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing · Texas

FWMurphy Production Controls

Rosenberg, TX · ~133 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FWMurphy Production Controls runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

FWMurphy Production Controls: 2.4 TCR = 72% of Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FWMurphy Production Controls safety composite

FWMurphy Production Controls scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2020→2022

FWMurphy Production Controls injury rate improved

FWMurphy Production Controls's TCR fell 1.4 from 3.0 in 2020 to 1.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=3.0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Rosenberg, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #27/32
  • PHOTO SICK Campus
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~133 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SICK Campus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

FWMurphy Production Controls in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FWMurphy Production Controls averages 2.4 TCR (72% of the Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FWMurphy Production Controls TCR series: 2020=3 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where FWMurphy Production Controls falls in its industry

322 Controllers for process variab establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 32 Controllers for process variab employers in Texas.

FWMurphy Production Controls (133 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate FWMurphy Production Controls
FWMurphy Production Controls (133 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

FWMurphy Production Controls has more employees than the Controllers for process variables (e.g., median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.6 0.5 3 0 0
2021 2.6 1.3 3 1 0
2020 3.0 3.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · TX · Rosenberg

322 Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 68 employers in Rosenberg, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SICK Campus 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Welker, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FTI Industries 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GFG INSTRUMENTATION, INC. 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dollins Pecan Co., Inc. dba Durham Pecan Company 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunrise Produce LLC 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE H. O. Clarke Service Center CP24 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry Building Inc 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROSENBERG PLANT 1,146 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC16 DC16 ROSENBERG TX 796 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4186-DC16 474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosenberg 345 FTE
NAT-TCR Liberty Court 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fern Terrace of Bowling Green 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR LeafGuard of Huntsville 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Centerville (#44) 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZCHW 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Albany High School 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gunderson Cleaners Inc 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pace 2 133 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.