Electric and electronic controllers, industrial process-type, manufacturing · Michigan

Gfg Instrumentation, Inc.

Ann Arbor, MI · ~29 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gfg Instrumentation, Inc. runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric and electronic controllers, industrial process-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Gfg Instrumentation, Inc.: 2.4 TCR = 72% of Electric and electronic controllers, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gfg Instrumentation, Inc. safety composite

Gfg Instrumentation, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Gfg Instrumentation, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Gfg Instrumentation, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 16.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=16.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Ann Arbor, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/12
  • PHOTO PA61 DREXELBROOK
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PA61 DREXELBROOK (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Gfg Instrumentation, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gfg Instrumentation, Inc. averages 2.4 TCR (72% of the Electric and electronic controllers, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gfg Instrumentation, Inc. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=16.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Gfg Instrumentation, Inc. falls in its industry

322 Electric and electronic contro establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 12 Electric and electronic contro employers in Michigan.

Gfg Instrumentation, Inc. (29 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Gfg Instrumentation, Inc.
Gfg Instrumentation, Inc. (29 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Gfg Instrumentation, Inc. has fewer employees than the Electric and electronic controllers, ind median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 16.6 16.6 0 4 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · MI · Ann Arbor

322 Electric and electronic controllers, industrial process-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 271 employers in Ann Arbor, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PA61 DREXELBROOK 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FWMurphy Production Controls 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SICK Campus 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Welker, Inc. 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Masterpiece Flower Company LLC - Merchandising (IN) 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Packing Co. Hart 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riveridge Cider 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Covert Generating Company 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital-AnnArbor 5,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph Mercy Hospital-Ann Arbor 5,554 FTE
CITY-NEAR IHA Health Services Corporation 2,533 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomson Reuters - Ann Arbor 1,090 FTE
NAT-TCR Larson-Juhl CHI 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CS Wholesale Grocers : Dubois, PA (GDC) 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Johnstone Supple (D&D Distributing) 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tower Metalworking Fluids 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goodwill North Canton Store 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plumbers Supply Co - Evansville 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roadstar Trucking, Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Penn Ontario Warehouse 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.