Drywall contractors · North Dakota

G & M Lathing Contractors, Inc

Fargo, ND · ~19 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

G & M Lathing Contractors, Inc runs at 603% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Drywall contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

G & M Lathing Contractors, Inc: 16.9 TCR = 603% of Drywall contractors BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

G & M Lathing Contractors, Inc safety composite

G & M Lathing Contractors, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2016→2024

G & M Lathing Contractors, Inc injury rate improved

G & M Lathing Contractors, Inc's TCR fell 4.9 from 4.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 33.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.9 · 2017=16.8 · 2018=14.8 · 2019=33.2 · 2020=26.1 · 2021=23.7 · 2022=25.6 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238310 · Fargo, ND ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.9 · 603% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO Apex Construction, I…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~19 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Apex Construction, Inc. - Tradesmark (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

G & M Lathing Contractors, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows G & M Lathing Contractors, Inc averages 16.9 TCR (603% of the Drywall contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

G & M Lathing Contractors, Inc TCR series: 2016=4.9 · 2017=16.8 · 2018=14.8 · 2019=33.2 · 2020=26.1 · 2021=23.7 · 2022=25.6 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where G & M Lathing Contractors, Inc falls in its industry

1,613 Drywall contractors establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Drywall contractors employers in North Dakota.

G & M Lathing Contractors, Inc (19 employees, TCR 16.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate G & M Lathing Contractors, Inc
G & M Lathing Contractors, Inc (19 employees, TCR 16.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.4

G & M Lathing Contractors, Inc has fewer employees than the Drywall contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.7 6.7 1 0 0
2022 25.6 12.8 4 0 0
2021 23.7 17.8 4 0 0
2020 26.1 15.7 5 0 0
2019 33.2 14.2 7 0 0
2018 14.8 9.9 3 0 0
2017 16.8 11.2 3 0 0
2016 4.9 4.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238310 · ND · Fargo

1,613 Drywall contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 415 employers in Fargo, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Apex Construction, Inc. - Tradesmark 16.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mulcahy Nickolaus 16.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kohel Drywall LLC 16.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intermountain West Insulation 16.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sea View Farm Tappen 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hexagon Farm LLP 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stanley 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Devils Lake CSC 19 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Fargo-Medical Center-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,963 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,FARGO - North Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 2,722 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,FARGO - Fargo Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 2,568 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Fargo-Broadway Hospital-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,547 FTE
NAT-TCR Twin Cities Specialties 16.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Alamco Wood Products 16.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ogden-W. 12th St #079 16.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sacramento-Watt Ave #133 16.9 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.