Plastering (i.e., ornamental, plain) contractors · California

Apex Construction, Inc. - Tradesmark

West Sacramento, CA · ~83 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Apex Construction, Inc. - Tradesmark runs at 605% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Plastering (i.e., ornamental, plain) contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Apex Construction, Inc. - Tradesmark: 16.9 TCR = 605% of Plastering (i.e., ornamental, plain) contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Apex Construction, Inc. - Tradesmark safety composite

Apex Construction, Inc. - Tradesmark scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2017→2019

Apex Construction, Inc. - Tradesmark injury rate improved

Apex Construction, Inc. - Tradesmark's TCR fell 1.4 from 16.6 in 2017 to 15.2 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 19.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=16.6 · 2018=19.0 · 2019=15.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238310 · West Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.9 · 605% of ind

  • DART 7.6 DART
  • RANK #225/228
  • PHOTO G & M Lathing Contra…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: G & M Lathing Contractors, Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Apex Construction, Inc. - Tradesmark in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Apex Construction, Inc. - Tradesmark averages 16.9 TCR (605% of the Plastering (i.e., ornamental, plain) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Apex Construction, Inc. - Tradesmark TCR series: 2017=16.6 · 2018=19 · 2019=15.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Apex Construction, Inc. - Tradesmark falls in its industry

1,613 Plastering (i.e., ornamental, establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #225 safest of 228 Plastering (i.e., ornamental, employers in California.

Apex Construction, Inc. - Tradesmark (83 employees, TCR 16.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Apex Construction, Inc. - Tradesmark
Apex Construction, Inc. - Tradesmark (83 employees, TCR 16.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Apex Construction, Inc. - Tradesmark has more employees than the Plastering (i.e., ornamental, plain) con median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 15.2 7.6 14 0 0
2018 19.0 12.2 14 0 0
2017 16.6 5.0 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238310 · CA · West Sacramento

1,613 Plastering (i.e., ornamental, plain) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 188 employers in West Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR G & M Lathing Contractors, Inc 16.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mulcahy Nickolaus 16.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kohel Drywall LLC 16.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intermountain West Insulation 16.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunny Slope Trees 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Land Co. (Grangeville) 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Land Co. (Stratford Shop) 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Land Co. (Lemoore Shop) 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR HEADQUARTERS: COMBINED ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS 6,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Administration 4,185 FTE
CITY-NEAR Department of General Services 3,631 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 36 2,161 FTE
NAT-TCR 5079 - OH Franklin County Corrections 16.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Primrose Lease Management dba Primrose of Duluth 16.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Appliance Center Warehouse 16.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Xfinity Center 16.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - High Point 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bay Path Rehab & Nursing Center 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Louisiana Hot Sauce 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Huntington Place 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.