Industrial caterers (i.e., providing food services on a contractural arrangement (except single-event basis)) · Alabama

GA Foods_E Montgomery

Montgomery, AL · ~18 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GA Foods_E Montgomery runs at 300% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Industrial caterers (i.e., providing food services on a contractural arrangement (except single-event basis)) workplace, earning a grade F.

GA Foods_E Montgomery: 9.0 TCR = 300% of Industrial caterers (i.e., providing food services on a contractural arrangement (except single-event basis)) BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GA Foods_E Montgomery safety composite

GA Foods_E Montgomery scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

GA Foods_E Montgomery: 0.0 → 17.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 17.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.97× in 2023

GA Foods_E Montgomery's TCR rose 17.8 from 0.0 in 2021 to 17.8 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Montgomery, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 300% of ind

  • DART 17.8 DART
  • RANK #66/77
  • PHOTO Neosho School District
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~18 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Neosho School District (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

GA Foods_E Montgomery in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GA Foods_E Montgomery averages 9.0 TCR (300% of the Industrial caterers (i.e., providing food services on a contractural arrangement (except single-event basis)) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GA Foods_E Montgomery TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=17.8 · BLS 3.0

Where GA Foods_E Montgomery falls in its industry

6,952 Industrial caterers (i.e., pro establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #66 safest of 77 Industrial caterers (i.e., pro employers in Alabama.

GA Foods_E Montgomery (18 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate GA Foods_E Montgomery
GA Foods_E Montgomery (18 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

GA Foods_E Montgomery has fewer employees than the Industrial caterers (i.e., providing foo median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 17.8 17.8 2 0 0
2022 9.3 9.3 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · AL · Montgomery

6,952 Industrial caterers (i.e., providing food services on a contractural arrangement (except single-event basis)) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 420 employers in Montgomery, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Neosho School District 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 000021030 BOSTON UNIVERSITY AGGANIS ARENA 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SONY SCEA CAFE 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT GRANDVIEW C-4 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cullman Hatchery 18 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frank Currie Gin company 18 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kelley Brothers Contractors Berry 18 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant McIntosh 18 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC 3,611 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Medical Center South 2,392 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jackson Hospital & Clinic 2,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Montgomery 1,561 FTE
NAT-TCR Armstrong Garden Centers 737 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hansen Manufacturing Corp d/b/a Hi Roller Conveyors 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ponca City Discount Food 419 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Delta Automotive Services, Inc. 9.0 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.