Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors · Alabama

G.A. West & Co

Creola, AL · ~1,200 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

G.A. West & Co runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

G.A. West & Co: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS 2.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

G.A. West & Co safety composite

G.A. West & Co scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

G.A. West & Co held a steady TCR band

G.A. West & Co's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.4 in 2018 to 0.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.4 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Creola, AL AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #6/33
  • PHOTO GEM Industrial Inc. …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~1,200 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GEM Industrial Inc. - Ineos (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

G.A. West & Co in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows G.A. West & Co averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

G.A. West & Co TCR series: 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 2.9

Where G.A. West & Co falls in its industry

924 Industrial building (except wa establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 33 Industrial building (except wa employers in Alabama.

G.A. West & Co (1,200 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate G.A. West & Co
G.A. West & Co (1,200 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

G.A. West & Co has more employees than the Industrial building (except warehouses) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.2 8 0 1
2023 0.5 0.2 7 0 0
2022 0.2 0.1 2 0 0
2021 0.7 0.5 11 0 0
2020 0.4 0.1 3 0 0
2019 0.5 0.2 5 0 0
2018 0.4 0.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · AL · Creola

924 Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 11 employers in Creola, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GEM Industrial Inc. - Ineos 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TEC Industrial (Tennessee Electric) 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mid-Tec, Inc 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5468-Longview Power 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Enterprise processing plant 1,200 FTE
STATE-SIZE New South Express, LLC 1,192 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0580 - Huntsville AL DC 1,209 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4701-736 1,210 FTE
CITY-NEAR Filters Now, LLC 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ashton & Co. Inc 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Freudenberg Filtration Technologies (Filters Now) Creola, Alabama 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR LSB Contracting, LLC 66 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlanta Regional Distribution Center 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SC - SPARTANBURG - 6135 Anderson Mill Rd 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Otis Elevator Company- OECF Bristol Research Center 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Advance Concrete Products 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sound Transit 1,200 FTE
NAT-SIZE JBS 1,200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashland City 1,200 FTE
NAT-SIZE SCAN Health Plan 1,200 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.