Health and welfare funds · California

SCAN Health Plan

Long Beach, CA · ~1,200 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SCAN Health Plan runs at 168% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Health and welfare funds workplace, earning a grade D.

SCAN Health Plan: 0.8 TCR = 168% of Health and welfare funds BLS 0.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SCAN Health Plan safety composite

SCAN Health Plan scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2019→2024

SCAN Health Plan injury rate improved

SCAN Health Plan's TCR fell 0.6 from 0.8 in 2019 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.8 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 525120 · Long Beach, CA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 0.8 · 168% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO Motion Picture Indus…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~1,200 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Motion Picture Industry Pension and Health Plans (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

SCAN Health Plan in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SCAN Health Plan averages 0.8 TCR (168% of the Health and welfare funds BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

SCAN Health Plan TCR series: 2019=0.8 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=1 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 0.5

Where SCAN Health Plan falls in its industry

12 Health and welfare funds establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Health and welfare funds employers in California.

SCAN Health Plan (1,200 employees, TCR 0.8) among 8 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 191 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Building Service 32BJ Benefit FundsMotion Picture Industry Pension and Health PlansCity of Bridgeport / Health DepartmentCity of Bridgeport Health DepartmentWilson McShane, MissouriWilson McShane, KansasWilson McShane, BloomingtonSCAN GroupSCAN Health Plan
SCAN Health Plan (1,200 employees, TCR 0.8) among 8 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 191 employees and a TCR of 1.3

SCAN Health Plan has more employees than the Health and welfare funds median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.0 3 0 0
2023 0.9 0.4 8 2 0
2022 1.0 0.9 8 2 0
2021 1.1 1.0 6 4 0
2019 0.8 0.2 5 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

525120 · CA · Long Beach

12 Health and welfare funds employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 614 employers in Long Beach, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Motion Picture Industry Pension and Health Plans 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilson McShane, Bloomington 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SCAN Group 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilson McShane, Kansas 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2643-64030211-211001 1,200 FTE
STATE-SIZE 289 TEMECULA VALLEY HOSPITAL, INC.-TEMECULA VALLEY HOSPITAL 1,200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco 1,200 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAS OPERATIONS 1,200 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorialcare Long Beach Medical Center 3,755 FTE
CITY-NEAR LBM00 LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MED CENTER 3,552 FTE
CITY-NEAR Total Terminals International, LLC. 2,683 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 300 2,621 FTE
NAT-TCR New York Communications Co., Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Des Plaines - Civic Center 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Maricopa County - Budget and Finance (180) 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kysor Warren/EPTA 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Inmar - 4355 Grand Prairie, TX 1,200 FTE
NAT-SIZE JBS 1,200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sound Transit 1,200 FTE
NAT-SIZE G.A. West & Co 1,200 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.