Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing · Michigan

Gage Pattern & Model, Inc.

Madison Heights, MI · ~34 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gage Pattern & Model, Inc. runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Gage Pattern & Model, Inc.: 3.5 TCR = 105% of Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gage Pattern & Model, Inc. safety composite

Gage Pattern & Model, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2016→2024

Gage Pattern & Model, Inc. injury rate improved

Gage Pattern & Model, Inc.'s TCR fell 5.1 from 5.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.1 · 2017=7.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=7.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Madison Heights, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 105% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #61/131
  • PHOTO Heise Industries, Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heise Industries, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Gage Pattern & Model, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gage Pattern & Model, Inc. averages 3.5 TCR (105% of the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gage Pattern & Model, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2017=7.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=7.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Gage Pattern & Model, Inc. falls in its industry

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 131 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma employers in Michigan.

Gage Pattern & Model, Inc. (34 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Gage Pattern & Model, Inc.
Gage Pattern & Model, Inc. (34 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Gage Pattern & Model, Inc. has fewer employees than the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.6 0.0 1 1 0
2019 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 7.1 1.8 4 0 0
2016 5.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · MI · Madison Heights

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 107 employers in Madison Heights, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heise Industries, Inc 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CTI Elk Grove 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SSAB Wear Solutions 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dienamic Tooling Systems 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE GS Ashley LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sportel Greenhouses, LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coldwater 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dearborn Industrial Generation LLC 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR MADISON HEIGHTS (MIMAD) 774 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIMAD - MADISON HEIGHTS 749 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIDET183 668 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIDET183 ASCENSION MACOMB-OAKLAND HOSP - MADISON HEIGHTS 509 FTE
NAT-TCR Brock - Milford 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR North Ice Cream Plant 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Rocky Mountain Instrument Co 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Piney Orchard Service Center 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Valley Park Facility 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Applied Dynamics 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Afton Chemical Corporation, Ashland Technical Center 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE A.R. Pierrepont Co., Inc. 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.