Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial · Massachusetts

Applied Dynamics

Greenfield, MA · ~34 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Applied Dynamics runs at 192% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial workplace, earning a grade D.

Applied Dynamics: 4.0 TCR = 192% of Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial BLS 2.1 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Applied Dynamics safety composite

Applied Dynamics scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Applied Dynamics held a steady TCR band

Applied Dynamics's TCR held near 0.3 from 3.8 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 14.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.8 · 2017=3.0 · 2019=3.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=14.8 · 2024=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Greenfield, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 192% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #15/31
  • PHOTO Mathy Sparta Shop
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mathy Sparta Shop (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Applied Dynamics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Applied Dynamics averages 4.0 TCR (192% of the Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Applied Dynamics TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=3 · 2019=3.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=14.8 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 2.1

Where Applied Dynamics falls in its industry

2,560 Electric motor repair and main establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 31 Electric motor repair and main employers in Massachusetts.

Applied Dynamics (34 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Applied Dynamics
Applied Dynamics (34 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Applied Dynamics has fewer employees than the Electric motor repair and maintenance se median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2023 14.8 7.4 4 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2017 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2016 3.8 3.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MA · Greenfield

2,560 Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 37 employers in Greenfield, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mathy Sparta Shop 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ITW/Hobart Service-Louisville Branch 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toyota Material Handling Northern California 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MH Danville 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE OPERATIONS CENTER - LOWELL DIV-MA40 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Commonwealth Building Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4675_10941 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fred Salvucci Corporation 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR BFMC - Baystate Franklin Medical Center 726 FTE
CITY-NEAR FMC - Baystate Franklin Medical Center 722 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWM - Greenfield, MA 265 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWM Intl. 261 FTE
NAT-TCR 1011 - BELFOR Chicago West IL 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Marchant Schmidt 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mg Millwork 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR New Model Program Development Center 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Valley Park Facility 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gage Pattern & Model, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Afton Chemical Corporation, Ashland Technical Center 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE A.R. Pierrepont Co., Inc. 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.