Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · New Jersey

Galactic Logistics LLC

Short Hills, NJ · ~93 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Galactic Logistics LLC runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade B.

Galactic Logistics LLC: 3.6 TCR = 55% of Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Galactic Logistics LLC safety composite

Galactic Logistics LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2022→2024

Galactic Logistics LLC injury rate improved

Galactic Logistics LLC's TCR fell 3.5 from 6.5 in 2022 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=6.5 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Short Hills, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.6 · 55% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #48/211
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - MGE5 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Galactic Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Galactic Logistics LLC averages 3.6 TCR (55% of the Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Galactic Logistics LLC TCR series: 2022=6.5 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=3 · BLS 6.5

Where Galactic Logistics LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Express delivery services (exc establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 211 Express delivery services (exc employers in New Jersey.

Galactic Logistics LLC (93 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Galactic Logistics LLC
Galactic Logistics LLC (93 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Galactic Logistics LLC has fewer employees than the Express delivery services (except establ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 3.0 3 0 0
2023 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 6.5 3.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · NJ · Short Hills

6,679 Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 23 employers in Short Hills, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - MGE5 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LCM Logistics LLC 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR OHAUS - AUSTINBURG 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 405 HANGAR RD 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Automatic Rolls of New Jersey 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Harris Freeman Group of Companies NJ 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lallypak Inc 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Owens Corning Roofing Plant 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Short Hills 429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Short Hills 015 354 FTE
CITY-NEAR 72006 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR 71015 184 FTE
NAT-TCR Progressive Powder Coating Inc - 7738 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Delmont 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Laguna Art Museum 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lundgren Motors Inc 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Matter Surfaces, Inc. MA 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holistic Farms LLC 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE PBBS Equipment Corporation - Corporate 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enclara Pharmacia - Memphis 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.