Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Arizona

LCM Logistics LLC

Phoenix, AZ · ~63 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LCM Logistics LLC runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade B.

LCM Logistics LLC: 3.6 TCR = 55% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LCM Logistics LLC safety composite

LCM Logistics LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
C 3.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

LCM Logistics LLC held a steady TCR band

LCM Logistics LLC's TCR held near 0.3 from 3.1 in 2022 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.1 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.6 · 55% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #15/130
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - MGE5 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

LCM Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LCM Logistics LLC averages 3.6 TCR (55% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LCM Logistics LLC TCR series: 2022=3.1 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 6.5

Where LCM Logistics LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 130 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Arizona.

LCM Logistics LLC (63 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate LCM Logistics LLC
LCM Logistics LLC (63 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

LCM Logistics LLC has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2023 4.3 4.3 2 0 0
2022 3.1 3.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · AZ · Phoenix

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - MGE5 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Galactic Logistics LLC 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR OHAUS - AUSTINBURG 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 405 HANGAR RD 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE South Plant 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE MG Building Systems LLC 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sollers Central Office 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Procon Professional Concrete, LLC 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Novi-B5510-Afh- Novi Store 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR TK Elevator Tulsa 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ECDC Lake Hallie - 3809 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mainstay Suites Orange County John Wayne Airport 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grand Prairie 6560 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Window World Belchertown 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Automated Building Control Systems Inc Tampa 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE SEF - Nelson Stud Welding - Liberty 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.