Distribution of electric power · Tennessee

Gallatin Department of Electricity

Gallatin, TN · ~41 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gallatin Department of Electricity runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade C.

Gallatin Department of Electricity: 1.4 TCR = 114% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gallatin Department of Electricity safety composite

Gallatin Department of Electricity scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Gallatin Department of Electricity: 0.0 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Gallatin Department of Electricity's TCR rose 2.1 from 0.0 in 2018 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Gallatin, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.4 · 114% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/70
  • PHOTO Lansing SC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lansing SC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Gallatin Department of Electricity in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gallatin Department of Electricity averages 1.4 TCR (114% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gallatin Department of Electricity TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Gallatin Department of Electricity falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 70 Distribution of electric power employers in Tennessee.

Gallatin Department of Electricity (41 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Gallatin Department of Electricity
Gallatin Department of Electricity (41 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Gallatin Department of Electricity has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 4.9 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · TN · Gallatin

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 100 employers in Gallatin, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lansing SC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR LUFKIN SVC CTR 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Monongahela Power Company 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbus Storeroom Annex Stn 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Thompson Construction Group Inc BAE Kingsport 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ronald Franks Construction Company, LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northwest Contracting Services, Inc. 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE PL-Enerserv, LLC 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sumner Regional Medical Center LLC 1,068 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gap Inc. - Central Omni 919 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gap Inc. - Gallatin Tennessee Omni 757 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tennessee Fulfillment Center 735 FTE
NAT-TCR Decorative Paving of Indiana LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ransom & Randolph 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Beaverton 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Community Center 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE XIT Rural Telephone Cooperative, Inc. 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE NILMNVentures 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edgefield County Water and Sewer Authority 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of White Bear Lake - City Hall 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.