Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Texas

Gama Aviation Engineering (KDAL)

Dallas, TX · ~28 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gama Aviation Engineering (KDAL) runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade C.

Gama Aviation Engineering (KDAL): 0.0 TCR = 0% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gama Aviation Engineering (KDAL) safety composite

Gama Aviation Engineering (KDAL) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Gama Aviation Engineering (KDAL) held a steady TCR band

Gama Aviation Engineering (KDAL)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.0 TCR.

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/101
  • PHOTO FL-AERCO-CORAL GABLE…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FL-AERCO-CORAL GABLES - FL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Gama Aviation Engineering (KDAL) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gama Aviation Engineering (KDAL) averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gama Aviation Engineering (KDAL) TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Gama Aviation Engineering (KDAL) falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 101 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Texas.

Gama Aviation Engineering (KDAL) (28 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Gama Aviation Engineering (KDAL)
Gama Aviation Engineering (KDAL) (28 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Gama Aviation Engineering (KDAL) has fewer employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · TX · Dallas

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FL-AERCO-CORAL GABLES - FL 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ALNM-AMI-ALBUQUERQUE - NM 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sherwood Aviation 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NM-AERCO-ROSWELL - NM 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village farms of Fort Worth 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle X Land & Cattle Co., Ltd. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Happy Hen Harwood 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ten Hi Gin INC 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Meijer 208 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Binghamton 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Detroit 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE CMC Energy- NJ 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Family Innovations Brooklyn Park 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hv-Open 12/6/10 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anderson Behel Body Shop 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.