Tomato farming, grown under cover · Texas

Village farms of Fort Worth

Fort Worh, TX · ~28 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Village farms of Fort Worth runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tomato farming, grown under cover workplace, earning a grade A.

Village farms of Fort Worth: 1.0 TCR = 23% of Tomato farming, grown under cover BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Village farms of Fort Worth safety composite

Village farms of Fort Worth scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2019→2024

Village farms of Fort Worth injury rate improved

Village farms of Fort Worth's TCR fell 2.7 from 2.7 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111419 · Fort Worh, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/10
  • PHOTO Columbia Care New Yo…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Columbia Care New York LLC.-Rochester (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Village farms of Fort Worth in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Village farms of Fort Worth averages 1.0 TCR (23% of the Tomato farming, grown under cover BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Village farms of Fort Worth TCR series: 2019=2.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Village farms of Fort Worth falls in its industry

251 Tomato farming, grown under co establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 10 Tomato farming, grown under co employers in Texas.

Village farms of Fort Worth (28 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Village farms of Fort Worth
Village farms of Fort Worth (28 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.9

Village farms of Fort Worth has fewer employees than the Tomato farming, grown under cover median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111419 · TX · Fort Worh

251 Tomato farming, grown under cover employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Columbia Care New York LLC.-Rochester 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABACA 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acres Cultivation 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Soothing Options 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Circle X Land & Cattle Co., Ltd. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Happy Hen Harwood 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ten Hi Gin INC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Littlefield Ops 28 FTE
NAT-TCR SBS Georgia (Alpharetta) 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Hallen Construction Co., Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Dura Coat Products, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR APCO Atlanta 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Barton Solvents, Inc. BT 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clinton 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 1092 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Centro Emergencias y Medicina Intengrada 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.