Office administration services · California

Gap Inc. - Corporate - 2 Folsom

San Francisco, CA · ~2,815 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gap Inc. - Corporate - 2 Folsom runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Office administration services workplace, earning a grade A.

Gap Inc. - Corporate - 2 Folsom: 0.2 TCR = 7% of Office administration services BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gap Inc. - Corporate - 2 Folsom safety composite

Gap Inc. - Corporate - 2 Folsom scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Gap Inc. - Corporate - 2 Folsom held a steady TCR band

Gap Inc. - Corporate - 2 Folsom's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.2 in 2019 to 0.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.2 · 2020=0.2 · 2021=0.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561110 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #4/61
  • PHOTO PLZ Corporation
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~2,815 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PLZ Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Gap Inc. - Corporate - 2 Folsom in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gap Inc. - Corporate - 2 Folsom averages 0.2 TCR (7% of the Office administration services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gap Inc. - Corporate - 2 Folsom TCR series: 2019=0.2 · 2020=0.2 · 2021=0.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 2.6

Where Gap Inc. - Corporate - 2 Folsom falls in its industry

544 Office administration services establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 61 Office administration services employers in California.

Gap Inc. - Corporate - 2 Folsom (2,815 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Gap Inc. - Corporate - 2 Folsom
Gap Inc. - Corporate - 2 Folsom (2,815 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Gap Inc. - Corporate - 2 Folsom has more employees than the Office administration services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.1 8 0 0
2023 0.1 0.0 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.1 0.0 2 1 0
2020 0.2 0.2 4 0 0
2019 0.2 0.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561110 · CA · San Francisco

544 Office administration services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PLZ Corporation 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MERCY SUPPORT SERVICES 645 MARYVILLE 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NAB HQ (WHITE PLAINS-1111) 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southwire Corporate Headquarters 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 100 2,817 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 108 2,817 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 109 2,817 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 112 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR SYRACUSE-NY97 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR EPI Power, LLC. 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Performance Contractors, Inc. - REG-Geismar 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Aleut Aerospace Engineering, LLC - Summary 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 220 East 42nd Street 2,815 FTE
NAT-SIZE Methodist Medical Center 2,815 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station 2,816 FTE
NAT-SIZE Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.