Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Illinois

Gardens of Bloomingdale

Bloomingdale, IL · ~59 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gardens of Bloomingdale runs at 239% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Gardens of Bloomingdale: 9.1 TCR = 239% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gardens of Bloomingdale safety composite

Gardens of Bloomingdale scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−27.3

2022→2024

Gardens of Bloomingdale injury rate improved

Gardens of Bloomingdale's TCR fell 27.3 from 27.3 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 27.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=27.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Bloomingdale, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 239% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #145/217
  • PHOTO Inspired Senior Livi…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Inspired Senior Living of Las Vegas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Gardens of Bloomingdale in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gardens of Bloomingdale averages 9.1 TCR (239% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gardens of Bloomingdale TCR series: 2022=27.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Gardens of Bloomingdale falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #145 safest of 217 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Illinois.

Gardens of Bloomingdale (59 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Gardens of Bloomingdale
Gardens of Bloomingdale (59 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Gardens of Bloomingdale has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 27.3 25.0 3 9 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IL · Bloomingdale

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 79 employers in Bloomingdale, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Inspired Senior Living of Las Vegas 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Somerby of Mount Pleasant 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Utica MC 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunridge 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cornbelt Fire Protection District 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Exelon Nuclear Services & Training Center (STC) 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Electric Field Meter Services 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0G5 - Gas Tech - Engineering 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR NOW Foods - Bloomingdale 661 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1553 350 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1553 338 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bloomingdale 260 FTE
NAT-TCR Durez Corporation 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Williams Professional Painting 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR NCF Employees INC 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Family of Caring at Teaneck ,LLc 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dolphin Beach Resort 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ll University LLC 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Gerards Community of Care 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE ECM Print 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.