Senior citizens' homes without nursing care · South Carolina

Somerby of Mount Pleasant

Mount Pleasant, SC · ~141 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Somerby of Mount Pleasant runs at 239% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Senior citizens' homes without nursing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Somerby of Mount Pleasant: 9.1 TCR = 239% of Senior citizens' homes without nursing care BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Somerby of Mount Pleasant safety composite

Somerby of Mount Pleasant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2022

Somerby of Mount Pleasant injury rate improved

Somerby of Mount Pleasant's TCR fell 3.1 from 11.1 in 2016 to 8.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.1 · 2017=14.4 · 2019=7.4 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=8.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mount Pleasant, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 239% of ind

  • DART 8.0 DART
  • RANK #61/107
  • PHOTO Gardens of Bloomingd…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~141 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gardens of Bloomingdale (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Somerby of Mount Pleasant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Somerby of Mount Pleasant averages 9.1 TCR (239% of the Senior citizens' homes without nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Somerby of Mount Pleasant TCR series: 2016=11.1 · 2017=14.4 · 2019=7.4 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=8 · BLS 3.8

Where Somerby of Mount Pleasant falls in its industry

6,510 Senior citizens' homes without establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 107 Senior citizens' homes without employers in South Carolina.

Somerby of Mount Pleasant (141 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Somerby of Mount Pleasant
Somerby of Mount Pleasant (141 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Somerby of Mount Pleasant has more employees than the Senior citizens' homes without nursing c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.0 8.0 7 0 0
2021 4.4 4.4 5 0 0
2019 7.4 5.6 8 0 0
2017 14.4 8.1 16 0 0
2016 11.1 11.1 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Mount Pleasant

6,510 Senior citizens' homes without nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 55 employers in Mount Pleasant, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gardens of Bloomingdale 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inspired Senior Living of Las Vegas 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Utica MC 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunridge 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE K101-M001 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Freudenberg Filtration Technologies - Wellford, South Carolina 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3026 LOWE S OF N. RICHLAND COUNTY SC 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2356 LOWE S OF RICHLAND COUNTY SC 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Town Hall 719 FTE
CITY-NEAR SSA-COOPER,LLC 694 FTE
CITY-NEAR SSA-ATLANTIC ,LLC 474 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4384 263 FTE
NAT-TCR Leighton Place 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR River Run Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Buffalo Branch Office 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 497794-Sal-Downtown Sta 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Punxsutawney 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE ARDx Freehold Halls Mill Road 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6723 Holland 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE EMS SW - Wichita 141 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.