Air compressors manufacturing · Missouri

Gardner Denver-Ingersoll Rand Sedalia MO

Sedalia, MO · ~270 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gardner Denver-Ingersoll Rand Sedalia MO runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Air compressors manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Gardner Denver-Ingersoll Rand Sedalia MO: 1.2 TCR = 38% of Air compressors manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gardner Denver-Ingersoll Rand Sedalia MO safety composite

Gardner Denver-Ingersoll Rand Sedalia MO scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2022→2024

Gardner Denver-Ingersoll Rand Sedalia MO injury rate improved

Gardner Denver-Ingersoll Rand Sedalia MO's TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333912 · Sedalia, MO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Compression Technolo…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~270 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Davidson-RTC USA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Gardner Denver-Ingersoll Rand Sedalia MO in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gardner Denver-Ingersoll Rand Sedalia MO averages 1.2 TCR (38% of the Air compressors manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gardner Denver-Ingersoll Rand Sedalia MO TCR series: 2022=2.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Gardner Denver-Ingersoll Rand Sedalia MO falls in its industry

128 Air compressors manufacturing establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Air compressors manufacturing employers in Missouri.

Gardner Denver-Ingersoll Rand Sedalia MO (270 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Gardner Denver-Ingersoll Rand Sedalia MO
Gardner Denver-Ingersoll Rand Sedalia MO (270 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Gardner Denver-Ingersoll Rand Sedalia MO has more employees than the Air compressors manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.5 0.7 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333912 · MO · Sedalia

128 Air compressors manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 92 employers in Sedalia, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Davidson-RTC USA 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cook Compression - Odessa 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quincy Compressor LLC (Northeast Region) 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Air Squared Manufacturing 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Maxion Wheels 270 FTE
STATE-SIZE 20 270 FTE
STATE-SIZE 48 270 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5631 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sedalia Plant 1,556 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stanley Black & Decker - Sedalia Operations 714 FTE
CITY-NEAR THE CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES 646 FTE
CITY-NEAR ProEnergy Services, LLC 577 FTE
NAT-TCR Pickett Road Norfolk 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CQ Insulation Orlando 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR IBP of Miami 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Callahan Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main Building 270 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage/Peabody Manor 270 FTE
NAT-SIZE Location 16001 270 FTE
NAT-SIZE Irvine Office and Sales 270 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.