Pumps, industrial and commercial-type, general purpose, manufacturing · New York

Gardner Denver Syracuse NY

Syracuse, NY · ~27 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gardner Denver Syracuse NY runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Pumps, industrial and commercial-type, general purpose, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Gardner Denver Syracuse NY: 1.9 TCR = 57% of Pumps, industrial and commercial-type, general purpose, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gardner Denver Syracuse NY safety composite

Gardner Denver Syracuse NY scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2019

Gardner Denver Syracuse NY injury rate improved

Gardner Denver Syracuse NY's TCR fell 3.8 from 3.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.8 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333911 · Syracuse, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO Curtiss-Wright EMD
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Curtiss-Wright EMD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Gardner Denver Syracuse NY in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gardner Denver Syracuse NY averages 1.9 TCR (57% of the Pumps, industrial and commercial-type, general purpose, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gardner Denver Syracuse NY TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Gardner Denver Syracuse NY falls in its industry

194 Pumps, industrial and commerci establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Pumps, industrial and commerci employers in New York.

Gardner Denver Syracuse NY (27 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Gardner Denver Syracuse NY
Gardner Denver Syracuse NY (27 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Gardner Denver Syracuse NY has fewer employees than the Pumps, industrial and commercial-type, g median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.8 3.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333911 · NY · Syracuse

194 Pumps, industrial and commercial-type, general purpose, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 436 employers in Syracuse, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Curtiss-Wright EMD 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pentair Flow Technologies LLC New Brighton 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MOLTEN METAL EQUIPMENT INNOVATIONS LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gorman-Rupp Industries 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rick Minkus Farms 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highbanks Dairy 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Van Slyke's Dairy Farm LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Synergy LLC 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Health 4,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY 3,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center 3,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center-SJH-NY 2,803 FTE
NAT-TCR Tops 650 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Abs 0028 0825 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Palmetto OPCO DBA Jolley Acres HealthCare Center 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR AMB030 Plantarium 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 40132 - Capstone Staples Chambersburg 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chantilly Center 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wright's Furniture, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakeside Urology 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.